Re: [DNSOP] Tell me about the ISO 3166 user assigned two-letter codes and TLDs

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Thu, 29 September 2016 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9991712B11B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rc043YhdB50c for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2C4412B0E0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id oz2so28785106pac.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=4y7Vr8KJVbLnvYGL2po1vLGy3wdqbWce1Xr7x/yfdHA=; b=o/MQD2aLqwiNwzTh4iX0nTddCmnvQQtMz5SAzQRC3ZmQYvWMpkkEUQEFue4GC/D3iu ZGJ+LLMpgru6UaI5+3810mpJOUlhO0MRRebPKZ5Hj61+FtUTiXlgrvj9USZA0rUKmqRj M+GHpl3t+EomEXkbbLae9E+ppzutdRXPJy6eNNZdGbxnGSXor+bW5ST2lsbKFtsnGUUu IgrRfpp2zRre8ZeX29t0DOd62F70eny5tJW43naSzDfMmkdRlrrmswvrOQWaii5vtYKH v4VsNmcG8Abx4/VeQlzKyEL/SH2yM4y+2QF1A6NUmfxu/IdMyq6PcFc8Wbsu+GNrIo7U XenA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=4y7Vr8KJVbLnvYGL2po1vLGy3wdqbWce1Xr7x/yfdHA=; b=TUPdsKQbFJUQcVFgEQ4+ijsWhdg4kxNy0wABdQgI/7Rzy/t3RfE/hZmzetEAgfVy2G Ph10ma58hO22PPHWWYNXOlXXthpYADO9IWiEcyszFHZBdhWiZm1OiNrW+T7btVibb4+0 HQVaSLbCZDTqOtW/URCilXylajwjipyjRaA+YZuyIkP2krr8wD8Kal0gm3h6YK2veaMB Eu2La1Dt6/olXaMTpjXJixoRnlEUubeBfhQdzwwp0sdFpFEuOZDg4NdurgA34AyRbVZD 0gjWybWdETEsvpwlKmxCKWZMMe3vyciXZWl/AdY8gr9AWr0Isi6NCeMyjIm0cnfkUzIF gHOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rn/eiKxX8ZCgaxp3I2mhnK62wSbcwQPnHQA+97zfjKCjLO/Ka0EC6rk6hinhRjAvQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.150.134 with SMTP id ui6mr3239098pab.41.1475162645225; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DACO-4417.local.mail ([2620:0:2d0:110:ada8:d247:c1d3:b00]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r29sm21162604pfd.37.2016.09.29.08.23.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:23:57 -0700
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Message-ID: <etPan.57ed320e.2dc25df3.25a@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160929000747.C498255364A5@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <20160928232720.9513.qmail@ary.lan> <20160929000747.C498255364A5@rock.dv.isc.org>
X-Mailer: Airmail (382)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="FA440141-6BC4-409D-BD5B-26006DA198A5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uAqB9-Gb4qND_Hn7Tz9O1zN4MCw>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Tell me about the ISO 3166 user assigned two-letter codes and TLDs
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:24:07 -0000

Mark,

On September 28, 2016 at 5:08:05 PM, Mark Andrews (marka@isc.org) wrote:
> I've been telling people that if they need a fake private TLD for their local 
> network they should use one of those since it is exceedingly unlikely 
> ever to collide with a real DNS name. Am I right? 

No. Just because countries don't get assigned these values it 
doesn't mean that they can't be assigned by ICANN or the IETF in 
consultation with ICANN. 
I believe from both the IETF's and ICANN's perspective, 2-letter labels at the root are reserved to be associated with ISO-3166 2-letter codes. I cannot imagine a plausible scenario in which this policy would change.

And who *needs* a fake tld? As far as I can tell almost no one. 
Can we PLEASE not repeat the arguments made against RFC 1918 space in the domain name world?

Regards,

-drc