IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 29 September 2016 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D40412B14F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 06:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.322
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.322 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.994, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.316] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7uDD_pvi5aoE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 06:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1A612B177 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 06:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3slGR706TDz3VP; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:59:47 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1475157587; bh=cOYVucTu8zXdwZ/QcOaTMW+U+6J4g0VMFmWdnMhvXbw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=nflV7L1bzd9nxaOraC6Z56O6/JIpVIYQpfogUTc1DQIA7w8R8rfVOOdUTQwHmuQR1 D8UlTuCFYpTPwh/o4f9HNNSpnEBNaSzY9jnmv0CpcCMeQjNGYneTc5ddwwehxQtd7I WWZRskY6lvSEEjtn9TErWYOKNGDT7BOsg9KCs7Is=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bHMwieAGZZ3l; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:59:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:59:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [193.111.228.71] (unknown [193.111.228.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4066E3522EC; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:59:44 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca 4066E3522EC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G36)
In-Reply-To: <20160928212406.GC4192@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:59:33 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BFAA2528-7310-4D10-99ED-48F8F8DA0B43@nohats.ca>
References: <CAHw9_i+UVH78URWzk+4x=j9BZiKfX3C+UeFU9vz1OfZ3tPeN1Q@mail.gmail.com> <20160920133357.hbvtkrg5uwgzu4wh@nic.fr> <CAHw9_iJ-9mMsu30fyEtJd7y7BPDh3BFjiXOK8dE_UynuF65sPg@mail.gmail.com> <20160925110204.GA12227@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1609251232400.22547@bofh.nohats.ca> <20160928212406.GC4192@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uJ12M-1SDuGlx2otcY5wqwtBWSY>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On the call for adoption on Special Use Names (Please! Pretty please, with a cherry on top?!)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 13:59:53 -0000


> On Sep 28, 2016, at 17:24, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:35:00PM -0400,
> Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote 
> a message of 16 lines which said:
> 
>>> it works (two TLD were registered through it).
>> 
>> Are you referring to the two registrations as successes or failures,
> 
> In the absence of criteria for defining success or failure of a
> special-use TLD, it will be hard to tell. But the _process_ was a
> success: applications were written, examined, and the registry was
> updated.

If the process was a success, we would have had the other candidates go through as well. The process was a failure because it has been rather arbitrary - which is why it needed to close down as it did.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email