Re: [DNSOP] Homenet implementation plans by vendors? Re: .arpa

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Thu, 23 March 2017 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52F7129512 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xiM-ygbZFu9j for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x243.google.com (mail-vk0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 929C81294FF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id d188so21991703vka.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YaWyJerm/LMrNcDKcxudm/pHSGIWD1dPz52pLPwndSs=; b=pckM06V/o8DAp+RgCzQl9FDV/uh0XSHkBbvd8YSWXKK7uZJUmYKb0dcEKfrxgFIn/e rPAGTYmQVm68hIZlMBDNyHQnhw8a1dyIqtKUxm5Kwd6QZloXr/W8+UPDXu/N7RfmwIup GsRPLcISJutMZJDCkvZjdaBrZMYRwn+tcOCAnYXmTtOGULJLjWXfn1c5q9rU0DAKj3Qd 9xQB1iAHGehNxGgUbVuyMqZODsQX9PfZDK3nzJ2mv/Diasi+a3I+vDxh9KkTpJ2K2uaO YUvSZuDlg9PD/oKMePAm88wygtrEP5mju4oKKV9pf0DCWlnYcqmbArTfPUJuPp1JoY6R zKjQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YaWyJerm/LMrNcDKcxudm/pHSGIWD1dPz52pLPwndSs=; b=SfYweDPIdE54NfhGP++dmyDfF4//Y9ZV6zCm0MyIJ/VMEHDTo7f80lMwQG2HtFkfXk DbQjfHf9uUXfzf1pPYkMTqT4yWVxGgq7+WYb4TwFRM40zxBPOaAofBuolmSCfHYEPa8V QtB6XgI6CIV9Zb2tkESmLkZ79AzsMRIrKuELKzwjz9+nAX7keDq+wG+qUYNbIETmCb+C nqV6bhVYiuDa06KHEl3bU/JFUcWbSjYdZbcBBieW1KMMMt2P5YAECz1o79nUudxSsI+L +t3jBZ1VsJF+01XYIz/bMBQKCrLyFFPeV4Ac1hEaDhtQ9XViF4Ex1bsdEEE/44+amssI 60zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3goEtgtxLVuzGHqRIqvKu7skYKz7lUtF78659DMdHSKfdCZ/o+HJMXDIMXsyt4pR6iELZFgK8Jmzgw7Q==
X-Received: by 10.176.84.211 with SMTP id q19mr2590052uaa.129.1490310512649; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.72.218 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dc0:a000:4:6593:f9cc:5da6:a1a8]
In-Reply-To: <16874ccd-f38b-85e7-b7c0-ba84761c1038@bellis.me.uk>
References: <20170323042741.79108.qmail@ary.lan> <2C6B4EB6-D0F0-44A8-95E4-68DF32244639@fugue.com> <20170323163205.GD19105@mx4.yitter.info> <500af1ed-5425-4452-ad8e-c2d511ee738d@bellis.me.uk> <850A8729-8762-4375-90EF-50CDF4AC232E@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703231351490.2262@bofh.nohats.ca> <a6e98737-b426-a67b-efe7-3603c531afcb@bellis.me.uk> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703231412130.2262@bofh.nohats.ca> <AB3C9BCC-AFF5-43E9-8312-ADFE28B75D0B@isoc.org> <88136264-A06D-4A46-9369-0F0059E633D9@fugue.com> <fedb7969-2ab0-ed84-477c-36c8b543257b@bellis.me.uk> <CAKr6gn0=myyntKVtfhefs3N5TVsUR8aMtAZB2m7hzTaLbNUa9g@mail.gmail.com> <16874ccd-f38b-85e7-b7c0-ba84761c1038@bellis.me.uk>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:08:32 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn2Deaa186h065n7++2dXJM9vKmA6Oz0G=K0NqNgAbtkfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uOGHoje7W5OsyX0Es0dLfnIggS4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Homenet implementation plans by vendors? Re: .arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 23:08:37 -0000

then I un-take my rant. apologies for ranting.

but to the sw authors of OpenWRT grrrrrr. parameterized? runtime configurable?



On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 23/03/2017 15:20, George Michaelson wrote:
>> here we go again "because its in running code, its too late to change
>> so my pre-emptive decision to code to it, trumps any process you ask
>> we invoke now"
>>
>> thats called squatting: its what other people do. and I repudiate it.
>>
>> you should have coded to example.com or a nonce.
>
> Actually, what's in the code right now is ".home".
>
> The whole point is to get ".homenet" blessed _before_ the code gets
> updated to use that, but we also want the amount of time that takes to
> be minimised so that the currently baked-in use of ".home" doesn't make
> that the de-facto default in perpetuity.
>
> Ray
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop