Re: [DNSOP] Moving forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-tld

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Sat, 31 July 2021 11:45 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBD03A232F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 04:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MpJDpMOKvWf6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 04:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [116.202.126.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D70983A232C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 04:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40EA0272; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 11:45:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1627731949; bh=Dqa8HvamZIjjxcKDAva3VganGSnSYAoehYq+PvBQqQ4=; h=To:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lBH4jOuGkb+ZXWTHnoYKfDKgl6aj1urwg4fqGgrWe5SxL4SKGPLPKNweTCahCvd3N 5n3XpEn8wDeM9SLn2Mf65mKuPl1Nu3bmEkZ+kx6drLIRS0Hh5H6ICdZNhpOYjqUZHv L6cW7vsu/VTtRH9iMEJPBXD5aqne+y1V0Qp6dJUdS1abePmXSWzDmrXPxxYC5bjgXZ LIeZ1GyGUPnS5nBEcRo6j/AF/U2jCfLvksKZeBCa/gOkOspRbJ0+SROTy1n7p7/ala PainJxJixUeCEremPI+KX65S8sxSicex7tGYGR2sve0Hp2PWTK66kU7cdzi2kvlJP+ +WjiQLYp9vw/w==
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <6ACDD435-1817-4B1C-8724-F984DC0D3B60@dnss.ec> <0E721930-2B00-4546-A6CE-99ED6B0AB1BC@nohats.ca>
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
Message-ID: <a91f4f02-b704-d13b-61d0-36baefbd4da8@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:45:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0E721930-2B00-4546-A6CE-99ED6B0AB1BC@nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uYVQoOUANQtjccGgfDindqD0vcI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Moving forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 11:45:58 -0000

Hi Paul, Working Group,

On 30/07/2021 20:43, Paul Wouters wrote:
> 
> So was draft-ietf-dnsop-delegation-only until it was killed yesterday due to lack of time because we had to spend it on political discussions with ISO liaisons.

To be clear, the discussion of the poll and priorities was informative 
and no decisions have been made about dropping WG documents yet.  Your 
argument that the document got delayed due to other more pressing drafts 
is acknowledged.

We also hold off the suggestion to raise hands for alt-tld draft in a 
similar way.  The poll helped the discussion, but is only part of the 
discussion.  For the individual drafts, the DNSOP chairs will contact 
the authors and discuss the way forward with the WG.


Best regards,

-- Benno