Re: [DNSOP] DNS versioning, was The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 20 July 2017 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC789131C27 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YD-nVYQ_Q2Vc for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D80E21288B8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:39343) by ppsw-30.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.136]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1dYBbM-000Ats-eV (Exim 4.89) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:34:48 +0100
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:34:48 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
cc: "Woodworth, John R" <John.Woodworth@CenturyLink.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "paul@nohats.ca" <paul@nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707200928290.4118@dhcp-8e4c.meeting.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1707201432160.4413@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1707190347390.10419@ns0.nohats.ca> <20170719215749.2241.qmail@ary.lan> <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD081E78B@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707200928290.4118@dhcp-8e4c.meeting.ietf.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uZoBqIvZBSDJIQ5qj7Hb1HCHB78>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNS versioning, was The DNSOP WG has placed draft-woodworth-bulk-rr in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:35:00 -0000

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
> BULK absolutely requires online DNSSEC signing,

This basically means that BULK is a master-only feature, which implies
that there's no need for BULK to work across zone transfers, which implies
the need to standardize it for interop is almost nonexistent.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Lundy, Fastnet, Irish Sea: South or southwest becoming cyclonic, 5 to 7,
perhaps gale 8 later. Moderate or rough, becoming rough or very rough later in
Fastnet and west Lundy. Rain or thundery showers. Good, occasionally poor.