Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)

Marcus Grando <marcus@sbh.eng.br> Fri, 06 March 2015 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <marcus@sbh.eng.br>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA66D1ACEA4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:28:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ABdn-x8oPCWq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:28:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC681ACE9A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:28:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obcuz6 with SMTP id uz6so21225421obc.9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 07:28:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbh.eng.br; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DEspH4fsJ4UOfA8z4TKTGCGB4UEa7xDtuXUkFSXHHGA=; b=SCmx4BpCM+bvjdppfaUD28JJU3iOTWB+B++UsMQKwnMZk1lZca33dd6ilIo/qoNCEI GIuvHKRz4ClrMe6TcX9NWKOf0bJlIywjpNYocDxsruPoYSXFWifGDGE2WuFwvNq52tsn 67P50aexHilBlZbpVkA85MCrktS6azNBPU5uU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DEspH4fsJ4UOfA8z4TKTGCGB4UEa7xDtuXUkFSXHHGA=; b=EdJDvrkDNuIEX6bS6k942PeE3Q6co6wED1WNhUCj/EG8b0tQcEPm247NGxBrABY0Fe P3vQMjdSx6fWbHohiJfCMT7GV0HurpuYqkXM2KiZYZBfY2ojD6utPwJaxsehOP5HWXq3 0C7j/514VAhbyxLqMtChuUeoUDtDXBHK6LwuwvmnQ7JkccohFAJrG/XPK3U365YNdG+i CLOIuyusI/d/zeO1ydVMkiO98hufpgfS+lVNEh7ryKputmb176H4wZvuNAoxIsX8hWiL PxWRyrT6Uuhxyg3TllKW7NhXBIGLh9djDLYiEpJmppC7z46502P88G9yDZ9UN/w/siQj 65cQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkDrXw+O/1pAbGCj0gHEOvI8Kb0LIoKRuBMdLLSXxuLOnPni3TpU3TDw7y7tsPg8w8oRKyr
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.115.99 with SMTP id jn3mr11428704oeb.68.1425655730089; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 07:28:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.182.122.66 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 07:28:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [177.43.249.158]
In-Reply-To: <54F9C29E.9040408@jive.com>
References: <20150306145217.GA8959@nic.fr> <54F9C29E.9040408@jive.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:28:50 -0300
Message-ID: <CAEyu5L9b_yB3t7i4fsvYgycrEqhjm9MHnXXSiOvC0gmNap7pkA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marcus Grando <marcus@sbh.eng.br>
To: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0116126e5d42f40510a0577f
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ukehmUlG9sgjyVX3quPAPzWDx5M>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:28:52 -0000

There's an thread about Firefox and ANY queries on dns-operations@ ML.

https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2015-March/thread.html#12897

Best regards

--
Marcus Grando
marcus (at) sbh.eng.br
mnag (at) FreeBSD.org
@marcusgrando

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
wrote:

> Le 2015-03-06 09:52, Stephane Bortzmeyer a écrit :
>
>> "Deprecating the DNS ANY meta-query type" (no Internet-Draft published)
>>
>> https://blog.cloudflare.com/deprecating-dns-any-meta-query-type/
>>
>> "Today, we are announcing that we are deprecating the DNS ANY
>> meta-query. In a few weeks we'll be responding to those queries with
>> rcode 4 / Not Implemented."
>>
>
> Good news!
>
> The problem with ANY is that it appears to work just fine. If a
> significant chunk of DNS servers start breaking ANY then it might
> discourage naive developers from attempting to use it.
>
> Simon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>