Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04.txt

Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com> Mon, 13 February 2017 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <rgibson@dyn.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0A5129762 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:15:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dyn.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N2Ow_2bnO71l for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:15:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x245.google.com (mail-ua0-x245.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47953129556 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:15:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x245.google.com with SMTP id a88so76091902uaa.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:15:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dyn.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BIWI3Hhur/WBWXFO7ctV0kri6mLpoWtCjeFDTcpjAtM=; b=aXFM2ivKG+Uf1x9la+UYmm/e7amobijRm5hHKoB0XU5Yvvn7BnUYrTcC//6e2fUWSd TgnPlo25sCn/CGZTGo7ItuCeaP5WbVQKRtnjnERMexwvw/jocBkVo0CZidqM+zQXd9yc OI9CvD/bL4L42Qavuy+4h/T7BMzCF2VsmBnQg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BIWI3Hhur/WBWXFO7ctV0kri6mLpoWtCjeFDTcpjAtM=; b=Eq8l6vM8xZ2v909PvW5nbXB6NzznumtFYg6/7AWu6OmuRDp6cTqUf+OtUaBcDW9XLN +hBadAErIA66v/HFLQc6wgIJbu1UdBZWKo3oOIzh/33lLYdMMy41lHDUhrFdb3KxnR96 FUTDGNMfL5kVw6pBw2R7I5Sn1oWMt/MBiXtvOax/DlCamG8vN7j5FyaMEoJbVxhZSfhZ OYyUnAbRL9LxIV+raPeHsaoMEkIlmKZHcfL+I0JctVo6EDmx/yL0FQueo/KOSMfwf4Gv OiXPPFke2MYTM+zPuQ3Il/HLH+680BCUKGGWbNBV9t9Wicl0GlvvLslS8HUkEoP0hBi8 tJDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mqaUXVKFYnyb9ry1xFnQXNEE5vF2zBZg5r70Pt0rIiwYNVZDLPyak4flfhQElujVNGILKXf3Xmf8gx2CEx
X-Received: by 10.159.34.228 with SMTP id 91mr12715333uan.159.1487009749361; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:15:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.5.131 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:15:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAN6NTqwGd0UT4fWf6_-kKJ-e4v-gMdVsAKpzRvP1ErmVRhnOyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <148661979638.4286.4234665114055399732.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC94RYZM+KMS2c3CVx=8Q005XYGQqNRv--23H7_aTpuY05tEMQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6NTqy9_jKXT4Fc9KhmcW7Fq6DTiU2HmzBoWn+YA1fALOh5zA@mail.gmail.com> <CAC94RYYhV0ye252bLNSGPmqQhdZ772AkaJ7us86X1j4nppsWDg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1702131258580.23062@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAC94RYbSkp2h_jOBgmrP3oZouSigPp9xPVxoKxkYft55qMyiZQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1702131642360.23062@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CAC94RYZSLzv=SDMxXTh2ZWZJUbG0AtMhmO62ynCpg-WO8XJcYg@mail.gmail.com> <20170213173801.j7dpxzjy5morksg5@mycre.ws> <CAC94RYYTZa0nXT8zdb_LFgKxpAx3Dc4kHZpE68-oh_DSbZxd4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6NTqwGd0UT4fWf6_-kKJ-e4v-gMdVsAKpzRvP1ErmVRhnOyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Gibson <rgibson@dyn.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:15:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC94RYZfVr4Un15W45xjzgg6OPy+=hwO62m7V8TmeshggxVNxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?w5NsYWZ1ciBHdcOwbXVuZHNzb24=?= <olafur@cloudflare.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c03bb66e429f605486d6fbc
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/usWzgWjdhNWAMvQ8WddBDjl5jGw>
Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, Robert Edmonds <edmonds@mycre.ws>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 18:15:52 -0000

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>
wrote:

> HINIFO is such a signal :-)
> thus your request applies only to Send-one and Send-useful responses.
>

Correct, as I covered in my initial message.

I do not think adding complexity will help at all.
>
>  ... you want an overhead cost forever just because of "muscle memory"
> learning curve for few people.
>

The overhead is already proposed by this document for name servers to apply
special QTYPE=ANY processing; I'm just advocating for its communication to
clients.