Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-03

Olli Vanhoja <olli@zeit.co> Tue, 26 March 2019 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <olli@zeit.co>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6341202ED for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=zeit-co.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1OyUNReR37D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C5B1202EA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id v14so8797013lfi.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zeit-co.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=f50Z8eYuj8pXVxVedo8O3V1loahFfHyOGp/uBBglJRo=; b=m4J2U/7dC43cRB6AMJ86WGrkXs7WHNMg7hzt2+rvwlaPGXuc21qs+JVC0OmPwgbrYd mbSOqSlWNFr1KpZICOzMDESnVZS1ojx4h2B7rw8HH6+AUEjBN0gLf9bZlFWYvbJy1yUW A3Z3sC1TcC2l89gTWc/rM6MRy5bYpWzm7DmK9hZHat3kwiYt17BSWIfLOtRWUY8uMwvW Sj0kri6yyhQL4FpmlXPE609/wd63H6be9WQ5hU6GurpZzP7ONY3oKlrcef0aH469uQGd 4mB1VYxx+wEvZAEZcmbwk2/HW7f6gVKKp08aX1cTxDdurDhvAaMCQMHFL6vRDKef16aS Q9Bg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=f50Z8eYuj8pXVxVedo8O3V1loahFfHyOGp/uBBglJRo=; b=JZnA0wJ1kt0Dj8fDWVDwIAtELpd7i187/Kag/QcqpTyOUyyk+1tsi9OL47fq9lHRbc lhyuEa82GNzNpdAaFYCYXGM0XkhjyGzLA6qm85JAJUsw7yjy8uy+rK/7aUBvZbMT/OD1 8a9xwxG0PDBIsexUAK+fM35jn2ZNy92QO/Zw48XJLdxR2BI5RgX/BYS8htjA0pxhA/PV 5Xs+bTcYiEkL9zWuVDvdcmSNBKdm6KoOUi1W/qOk6XNzdzrFEjDUTzs3a/eyn6s4noAs 1qz4cKFfPS1hzcRnWTqxdAeJn/n+J+eAtZphPzRr1Q4Df1uZmY6WyI7sD35bc7ywHBnM y26g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXVlKVeHs0hioW1g6C/T7+6rszhOk4q+KlXFOhrMjh1LJklzz6w HucC1olaYfmsjrIoIxpMReALfTxBQ9I451RvPzfY7BFPUmk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxwODx/nVFPFJFYrDul0CTkeJwdkSUTNzqb2tCMQwUNxUahcjzEArFoFDNbt3HcfabZc5zYlqoQTY7f6/5MZOs=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:81c9:: with SMTP id c192mr16418048lfd.108.1553607272526; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 06:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJE_bqdugE3oMqyHres4hwhs4-NpO8yW2FwGDrk2WDAtbweBiQ@mail.gmail.com> <23682.53436.400539.805166@gro.dd.org> <8ffa4b04-324a-36c8-a9ff-e0cda726a54c@NLnetLabs.nl> <841f8174-c7d5-c702-e6be-ccb9a7c2c048@redbarn.org> <fe4aecac-aa46-e269-bc77-5250b383685a@bellis.me.uk> <CA+9_gVsfrJVtqqsniJ_f4NKkbtz5J4Q=eHxvxX9Ud86u5=j9Hw@mail.gmail.com> <e75aa69c-e02b-72a1-6375-660151afbdd2@bellis.me.uk> <23705.25657.838079.44692@gro.dd.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903261143580.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <CABrJZ5HxtBg5r==vkgkoBctE2-qiui72VLOYReoWBKtZStmY-A@mail.gmail.com> <23706.9934.901015.529885@gro.dd.org>
In-Reply-To: <23706.9934.901015.529885@gro.dd.org>
From: Olli Vanhoja <olli@zeit.co>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:34:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrJZ5Hsb6FR+s=n3pGugqTD7hYE7rnM6_TifO06Xcdg7CAv2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uwtpVQQcOvN6GTKWL0CuDEIHzI0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:34:39 -0000

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:19 PM Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> wrote:
>
> On the other hand I have direct operational experience that says if a
> problem is being caused not by a generalized DOS or other transient
> network issue, then it can indeed take multiple days to resolve.
> Start of a long weekend?  Trying to reach the right people to fix it?
> Surely you've experienced customers not responding quite as quickly to
> fix their problems as you'd like.
>
> So I'm not so keen on one day, but could see dropping the
> recommendation to 3.  It is, after all, still just a recommendation
> and one that should be configurable.
>

Yes, I remember that this has happened a few times at large scale during
the last few years. I'm a bit worried if it would still cause more problems
than it would solve.