IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-05.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement) to Informational RFC

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 12 June 2017 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F9A126FB3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:17:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a97DW6W0tEaF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ABE3127342 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id w1so129169318qtg.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=E55qGa17/5orOBadChvN+ZY7WU+4I8GVP/9iap3v0sw=; b=VLk1n7LjlGr/xl3CTMu7ycniuv33linwQGpcSxI0Qrsu+PuDYFfyXOiuhqt8J4Iq7O szY4Eo01waqv26LEbgVMUwy3Ce67O6yaE8GW1S3yNoEr/5BIFEVVL0lYDKvA58OwBsD/ B9bGR6sirKYRxq3Q9huCQx2NNDuyFKc3l/SdT7WgQSfcb9KmlJl2mCNgzQmJl53y0rk+ gQBBOF9twNB2LBUN7CsVjyCImGSn+kySb0Mn3rj/lw0fDoPS4f53lVpx//l2pXtyQNBP e0ZdG6NuT8+mxWOyzl7+5Scu5jRU6bp5Npn2+0y6D2wdFCAskoR7tyZrPurAyCZy0cfZ TlOw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=E55qGa17/5orOBadChvN+ZY7WU+4I8GVP/9iap3v0sw=; b=H1VNPlc+PecYjLw5jGAGPvtaYnBeJpVF911K8y2FCpxhKJ4qXLrgCxO3HOoe9uI6l2 sgcWNYzpow83tZ2a31vzkRAnvIq+cS4vcQh7HGy9CzJKJwd97aNI56Uvn3uAwZI8OA6/ B6D8n1Tp32WJ66ZO5McwDwtPMYZda6D1Kf45jBXdiVuGlqK4Y0NA22iXaMX20S5yZrbL tdD4XMDvdz3pwD3/tO6KjEAzM0D8MMp39OrvX5F7lGBX3bA09YYK0UxIJ9nyRMgpn2GW dBUFuJG6eY9aK2ggbWBeE5Qk1a1BFbL3JDu9W7pw99MTp3DI6YcCUph8el4vDUzwkQpQ n+SQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOy2UAsxx2XOLc+Rs6YMxUjqjzwfX5tlZ1b/OW4tvAmu6ZdkgTeZ rNJfnAf4s3feS5KM
X-Received: by 10.55.86.199 with SMTP id k190mr42146276qkb.70.1497280644353; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j6sm4923261qkd.0.2017.06.12.08.17.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <CE770688-DC27-4BB7-ABD9-B3B873532D47@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8665EF6E-0DE7-49C0-8263-7827973BC937"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 11:17:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170612151508.s7xf5aamnme5ridb@nic.fr>
Cc: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
References: <149678027581.3850.9197039878287017082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170612135200.ya3tivlhg2dhe3ry@nic.fr> <20170612150034.f4etrpuhbnvbzpzz@hanna.meerval.net> <7FA9EF11-83AF-4B1B-88D4-151108A47057@fugue.com> <20170612151508.s7xf5aamnme5ridb@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/uy3pi-S35lsFHHaqD6MoFHyYGz4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-05.txt> (Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 15:17:27 -0000

On Jun 12, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> Me too (no longer talks of "unilateral" use)

"unilateral" isn't a criticism.   It's what happened.   There's a reason that it happened.   I don't think we should minimize that.   I disagree with the idea that was advanced by some folks in dnsop during the .onion discussion that the unilateral use of the name was bad.   It was common practice at the time.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email