IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http-02.txt

Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com> Thu, 22 March 2018 10:44 UTC

Return-Path: <songlinjian@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6722B120726; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0QOHvEQ3tKaJ; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22a.google.com (mail-vk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BF611200C1; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id r197so4914949vke.2; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YhNqkGmR/26pf8mCPb+VC303xhFIbsFiPtRM2g0auKI=; b=ErpKU/b+9vcJGQKPsnfFe22iNT8ncp7VFO0CGbWwIznA6XyGs8/kdJQRmfgDTjcXrR pe5rKWy8bQco4NB3oCa6rShytL5qzgpM878BqZeYlvKwShsgYQnRpTVp5HO//fr1hL8p m0Sw6D0OePNs7CABD7mdd5PR/7RZBLVf9eo9JB3AQMAfKx9vvGU9ArGqa19q+pvfUQ7Z /wZwfYZMFbbgsFE4LrqKTeZ0b22Cn5m9iP1UUz+I+H9RQcHI33vcuBPK4VYnds/2pB6n BWPNshKFSI44cwy3KlwJzZ9GC1BpdhZJ5nFonuMVCE+m0C9drBKBglqoaAZGpw8UL5TG kw1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YhNqkGmR/26pf8mCPb+VC303xhFIbsFiPtRM2g0auKI=; b=JJYHLQLarwFFYi+DRJkdZymHqn3BFsr085KLtp9x+OB3eC/Dco+3vU9QO9B8pRxXCD zb+LGtNhFosBIa24nhFfENM9dywlCP/4kLm/AEaONIHxlJxM9GE+tCR/FrLmcHqdCyOP kyeNCuNENpHhqJ5iokVubIMQGJS3soMfMebQF8ufAM4smhUGQatn7fzByq8phXt56hSE oOza0NpYN4j+a61AZ/VI1gPvwzSRG8buCnsP19uRMRW6nb3iGAnU/14gCJkiK1XHBtvQ hzeem8GtU2fKQWA/hTofxtd4G/airO8E9cyZ95+G3UBjCAeg5BSGMbJEIIeyV+DY169Q 7i9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FT/H3bVODgj1bECpqF+JIy0ZIN5mIsKtGH7CKU1jQHioBSH7lL 3OaRwAFaM37RQdRnnhJXsp/qSEesX0o2WnlA0bc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuoR6Jd5B2bTt2+Whdu0lbAR8JwaLBPU5yRjgGz3qo0z2vbBGPPGPEOQrO+ieLLEl35cCbOlpDDtzM79vwVTig=
X-Received: by 10.31.50.13 with SMTP id y13mr15390862vky.85.1521715443192; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.43.143 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 03:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <23219.33838.166003.614689@gro.dd.org>
References: <152168039295.5550.9572034766968749020.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAObRXLm3c-p9rZkn6H6tcEoh3-UT5JW06NXQ_FMyyr2NFMmyw@mail.gmail.com> <23219.33838.166003.614689@gro.dd.org>
From: Davey Song <songlinjian@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 18:44:02 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAObRX+xF5SwVd3x3iXSWd-A0Kpr_ubbOJzn0yTrSk8pc+tm6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, doh@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114405f070dd240567fdfc1a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/vDkNRlTQqu6YO3iDSSb3PucND_8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:44:05 -0000

To keep the transparency of DOH proxy, the proxy server should use the same
transport as the proxy client receive queries from stub-resolver,
transports patterns like UDP-DOH-UDP, and TCP-DOH-TCP. So the proxy client
should signal the proxy server the initial transport recieve from
stub-client.

Davey

On 22 March 2018 at 18:23, Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> wrote:

> Davey Song writes:
> > Is a media type "application/dns-tcpwireformat" acceptable
>
> Without yet having (re-)read the draft, I'm unclear on what benefit
> this media type is bringing over dns-udpwireformat, since the only
> difference presumably is explicitly adding the two octets of a
> content-length <= 65535.  Is it something other than that?
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email