IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2845bis and HMAC-MD5

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Fri, 15 March 2019 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE12A130E81 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 05:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y5yLafV1m4lE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 05:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3488130E62 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 05:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:58158) by ppsw-32.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1h4m5F-000qcb-0G (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:37:09 +0000
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:37:08 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
cc: Martin Hoffmann <martin@opennetlabs.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <B35DCCF0-F236-4FB1-85D1-C10276EEF449@nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903151234210.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20190314155324.4841ce29@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl> <B35DCCF0-F236-4FB1-85D1-C10276EEF449@nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1870870841-1837014526-1552653429=:13313"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/vHEAkudMlk06aBo0zRkJNoFP6mQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 2845bis and HMAC-MD5
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:37:14 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 2019, at 15:53, Martin Hoffmann <martin@opennetlabs.com> wrote:
> >
> > As such, I would like to propose to move HMAC-MD5 to optional and only
> > retain SHA-1 and SHA-256 as mandatory.

> It’s too soon. Only a year or so again there was only hmac-md5

I don't understand that comment ...

4635 HMAC SHA (Hashed Message Authentication Code, Secure Hash Algorithm)
     TSIG Algorithm Identifiers. D. Eastlake 3rd. August 2006. (Format:
     TXT=16533 bytes) (Updates RFC2845) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) (DOI:
     10.17487/RFC4635)

BIND got support in 9.5.0.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Forties, Cromarty, Forth, Tyne, Dogger: West 7 to severe gale 9, decreasing 6,
then becoming cyclonic later. Moderate or rough, occasionally very rough at
first in Forties and Dogger. Showers, rain later. Good, occasionally poor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email