Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Tue, 20 October 2009 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388303A680C for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1WvSNDxGd+FD for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from monster.hopcount.ca (monster.hopcount.ca [216.235.14.38]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B353A66B4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [199.212.90.22] (helo=dh22.r2.owls.hopcount.ca) by monster.hopcount.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jabley@hopcount.ca>) id 1N0OHY-000Bdn-B3; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:38:25 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <200910202329.n9KNT56j048843@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:38:19 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1F61DD04-14A6-4349-8650-9CF27D27C3BC@hopcount.ca>
References: <OFA656600E.F5229B3D-ON80257650.005247BF-80257650.00527644@nominet.org.uk> <82skde36c9.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <DE23E9BF50E437E2D5CA65C8@Ximines.local> <82ljj61gle.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <200910202329.n9KNT56j048843@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076)
Cc: Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk, dnsop@ietf.org, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:38:24 -0000

On 2009-10-20, at 19:29, Mark Andrews wrote:

>> ARPA will soon be signed, so I don't think this is much to worry
>> about.  If the powers that be finally agree to make NXDOMAIN/NODATA
>> synthesis the default in the upcoming minor DNSSEC revision, this  
>> will
>> also help to cut down the number of requests.
>
> And LOCAL.ARPA would need to be a unsigned delegation.

Could you explain this? The draft under discussion specifies that  
LOCAL.ARPA is not to be delegated at all, so your sentence above  
confuses me.


Joe