IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-00.txt

Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org> Mon, 26 March 2018 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ondrej@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88041275AB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lw8YflxThjoT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D181120713 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 07:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1CF93AB002; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:12:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5421A16006B; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:12:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B714160066; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:12:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Zj8cfrGJQxrc; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:12:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.10.0.193] (40.20.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.20.40]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E28B160043; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:12:30 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803261431310.10477@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:12:28 +0200
Cc: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <772249B6-6767-47F7-9422-A438033C11BA@isc.org>
References: <CA+nkc8DhXEEhiDqwHuA-_zNQc0n=rTZ-VZ6X8-0w-tY_0SC0eA@mail.gmail.com> <40ABB9EB-58EC-48FF-8117-60EE0E7006EF@isc.org> <CA+nkc8BfMKRUHuW+3EzOCeZHfmu1jeOgfVcszTbTYh9k2VTBcA@mail.gmail.com> <002DCABB-24CE-42FA-8DA6-2A458E5F89A1@isc.org> <5AB53F8B.9070504@redbarn.org> <7CF21F70-9419-4D6A-B555-FC229F90E8A9@isc.org> <5AB546CB.3030408@redbarn.org> <CCAE4014-67F8-4E73-A893-AA06B83E880B@isc.org> <20180324124958.GA29255@puck.nether.net> <CAJhMdTPRn=mUQ6xh_HFdFLBk109b_M2+saS86KFxsttb8_oVvw@mail.gmail.com> <20180325080558.GA18671@isc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803261431310.10477@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/vHp8mOXo7WcSqmF2znbEytAkxeA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 14:12:36 -0000

> On 26 Mar 2018, at 15:39, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> 
> Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> wrote:
>> 
>> These RR types have text representations and wire format representations,
>> which from a complexity standpoint seem quite harmless to implement.  There
>> are the old annoying rules about name compression and sorting, which do add
>> some complexity, but are already implemented in all the existing codebases.
> 
> There's the particularly special case of WKS which has weird collision
> logic - RFC 2136 section 3.4.2.2. It's extra weird that this was specified
> in 1997 when WKS was deprecated in 1989 - RFC 1101 and RFC 1123.
> 
> I fear that this will make it hard to delete WKS code because that may
> introduce interop bugs if a new server bindly allows colliding WKS records
> that an old server objects to.

Good catch. WKS would then probably need a separate document that would also remove it from RFC 2136.

But it’s funny that we should not remove a record while this was already written in 1989:

      An application SHOULD NOT rely on the ability to locate a WKS
      record containing an accurate listing of all services at a
      particular host address, since the WKS RR type is not often used
      by Internet sites.  To confirm that a service is present, simply
      attempt to use it.

While the special processing was added to RFC 2136 (9 years later) is really beyond my understanding :(.

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ondrej@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email