IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Lameness terminology (was: Status of draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis)

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Fri, 04 May 2018 00:03 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5999C127058 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 17:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UzDyfb-Gqbf8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 May 2018 17:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CD971271FD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 May 2018 17:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1AD3AB190; Fri, 4 May 2018 00:03:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47B9E160071; Fri, 4 May 2018 00:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E88F160072; Fri, 4 May 2018 00:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id bq7TvvD3IWQx; Fri, 4 May 2018 00:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.30.42.90] (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B8EA160071; Fri, 4 May 2018 00:03:12 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <5BF2CD68-EDB4-4A82-82BD-7823DCBD4CA7@icann.org>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 10:03:10 +1000
Cc: Frederico A C Neves <fneves@registro.br>, Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <79765B4C-2F9C-4B7F-99E4-4B244A9A4A27@isc.org>
References: <7C873271-A784-4594-91A3-48C697EEC613@vpnc.org> <b3ed96d7-26fb-3d97-118b-39e8f352a38c@time-travellers.org> <87F43055-5B0E-4551-BD8D-241D93F9039F@icann.org> <0AA87D00-17F7-4D10-A72D-E4723C4A0642@icann.org> <B1F34038-595E-48A5-AFB6-20F3214BB8BF@isc.org> <EFC5B29C-48D2-4F5C-BF2D-26C26E302889@icann.org> <20180503224136.GD62787@registro.br> <5BF2CD68-EDB4-4A82-82BD-7823DCBD4CA7@icann.org>
To: David Huberman <david.huberman@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/vUZ1WvGBUU8lSQJUu-Vpca0GDiQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Lameness terminology (was: Status of draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 00:03:45 -0000

> On 4 May 2018, at 9:37 am, David Huberman <david.huberman@icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Fred wrote:
>> As long as there is community support Mark's observation works as
>> expected.
> 
>> Slightly variatios of this policy are in place for LACNIC and APNIC
>> regions and is very effective.
> 
> Thank you, Fred, and apologies for my incomplete answer that was biased
> by my geography. 

Which is easily fixed by having wording that says that you need to maintain
working RFC compliant DNS servers for the delegated reverse zones or the
delegation will be removed.  This is a policy failure on ARIN’s part for
failure to make explicit what is implicit in the RFCs.

List the tests you know intend to make.  Mark the list as being non-exhaustive
which allows you to add additional tests in the future.  Start testing and
reporting immediately.  Enforce after next contract renewal. 

> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email