Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing-05.txt
"Niall O'Reilly" <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> Tue, 23 September 2014 15:59 UTC
Return-Path: <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49DE1A82E2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kDY3lwjhC1a3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:59:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F7481A1AD2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z12so851727wgg.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ZBToy2BqkfBbPaVVYhQGUfocm9kalEsQ4qQ54489VPM=; b=WBLRUCctJPKXbynzfJLfmuw+nbHzu66pWx4FkmOFsh3cEq4xe+Ona6t036lHB6/8V/ sqqND6sGBhLUwmc62ysbvcr2k/Fq0Ae7DHjqCJRLjkXXo5Evk7bNsZdgfkK7pFavQeQN 2HUs+V4ZnyHI+dppqteROxZUUaL/nCtFABr6wN/dRngXk/YHKCJbTsaRjfRCmlSGlMT0 phHvDk8hJpnqZTjIY/MJIsYE0PQh1wsgFmD1XUMsSjLGGEpOoELEhGp3y0RhA6Ft4TDl tqFeRasFJeevZeMB3ZfHSKxigPJkkHHtVZGdpCAeA4ZHrHZmnFmJOmrLrp0RB/eGHZPi MRNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlPR4NOYaZIcu8D7QL3OHuNMuIfHdfCGdta/Skp7Erum0SyvT4qX2HHCN+HDodLDRDZH5t/
X-Received: by 10.194.58.148 with SMTP id r20mr785704wjq.66.1411487963693; Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-179.wlan.no8.be.ucd.ie ([2001:770:13f:1:28a4:8320:8ba3:b999]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x6sm3060292wif.0.2014.09.23.08.59.22 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie>
X-Google-Original-From: Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:59:24 +0100
Message-ID: <m238bijpk3.wl-Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <16CE283F-A436-43F0-B5B6-52CBC57C8DAB@vpnc.org>
References: <20140917121858.30503.75097.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <541B29CE.5040908@gmail.com> <C3C8B727-1B0C-4DA2-9885-B4AFEC9F3580@vpnc.org> <m24mvyjqcc.wl-Niall.oReilly@ucd.ie> <16CE283F-A436-43F0-B5B6-52CBC57C8DAB@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/vYqrPFZ45_du0uPtpCFYHW132uE
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing-05.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:59:26 -0000
At Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:51:26 -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > Does the following help? > > For ZSKs, the issue for the zone operator/signer is to ensure that > any caching validator has access to a particular signature also has > access to the corresponding valid ZSK. After reading the alternative below, I think this needs s/validator has/validator which has/ > Or: > > For ZSKs, the issue for the zone operator/signer is to ensure that > if a caching validator has access to a particular signature, > the validator also has access to the corresponding valid ZSK. Perfectly clear; thanks. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-t… internet-drafts
- [DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-k… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-k… Niall O'Reilly
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-k… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-k… Niall O'Reilly
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-k… Stephen Morris
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-k… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-k… Paul Hoffman