Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309D3129EC5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:59:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E2Ea3iBD0mkY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:59:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5326129E94 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id s140so59222823qke.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 07:59:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=nmjD6gUHGDC+b5ixTLtYE0g8nFi1eTRlXidC+LJTgKQ=; b=CalNYzcNlE8f/Y3QhLuWhYg3inpiol2+AcK13V6mB8RYfePvPLE+onXw0LkDhva8Gf elHGpxjx2N4spFvQJ3ChCUZ9HZ04IRsMSpVrLCzo8iNfz8fqvCUAr81dzgr+8QOsE/ba 131GkVAxgwjx2jZz9gMPjxmo9yyf76BqFkBLXMmXELrn5Sf1Og1ekbch12RAG7AnUKog ICMSvcN75vgyOeRqr1Hflq+nCsMv9CotTozh1IR1xZ6XYKI7j4H6G7gnIizKrF0WESU0 QtqJg5NFYfqNkexh5uGGioA4XizLTSannW59dj4VOVN+LNl+lF5NE+iUXCRjyDC9wxy3 Po9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=nmjD6gUHGDC+b5ixTLtYE0g8nFi1eTRlXidC+LJTgKQ=; b=EXY2GUooXppLNhtUpmmm27zBRA9c6XNoma5Zv7ICBAmxDfrGCuNLks7mPs+TEB8pZP TDg8C1SD1hUwrwH6XC/26B0XX7tJWUPo0Pnv9oMaF3ORU2oT1cJGtVKqz3t3149pKgtx 9f4x93BjG/AJNPckgrd2NhF73yFoTH0UA9PBhY34F2zfmLUWO+quQS+Ki2hu/XtCemtm 8M2SPl7GKHBd9R79V3n453QTujGbpEqfbrDnf2B2Nssbm96K6VFCCNqwe2SjrFxXHZuc XJey+tDgvK7zu8JjseEbkHb/wMo4eC+0pAMPMjSFPzrgVhKjN3bupsBWAusjLTRx4h3n hTeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kAeLcnp+FbDmVZ8OiZJuLrIeOzb7JSkmKc6pKIpDejEcyrapWJzV5D+XViz6y5hA==
X-Received: by 10.55.26.218 with SMTP id l87mr10888538qkh.59.1486396751966; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 07:59:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o199sm831588qke.35.2017.02.06.07.59.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 07:59:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <B91AA443-F82D-4923-9343-6A5DDD206A4C@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9804043F-E585-46C0-BF80-B1444F7FDC56"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 10:59:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <EFFF717C-3A5A-4877-8B40-2D5DF42FD19C@ogud.com>
To: Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
References: <6391B5BB-19BD-4717-B9BB-ECD145F7B4F6@fugue.com> <20170206040516.1701.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1mbzhS19G_uDA8HokVxXuHy5uA7F1c84-1yUUpqZ2ifJQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1702052315130.13902@ary.qy> <CAPt1N1m2mowdCF6igU0TN-FCcjas9AaY-uGma4HgPGKx0Jg4Tw@mail.gmail.com> <4E481C14-1C2B-4A18-A4F2-582208C1DDE3@ogud.com> <6B4E9F56-1487-4E09-9245-167C4790AB3D@gmail.com> <EFFF717C-3A5A-4877-8B40-2D5DF42FD19C@ogud.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/v_vomSeNXhYuywNuVEyfI6GAJPw>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 15:59:14 -0000

On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Ólafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:
> A WG can come to a consensus on a topic without all information available.
> Now go back and see if reality changes consensus.

I presented a detailed explanation of the tradeoffs, which the working group considered.   If you think something has changed, you should first review the discussion, since it sounds like you never read that detailed explanation.  In that explanation, I made the precise point you are making: that homenet.arpa would be more expedient than .homenet.