Re: [DNSOP] Current status of draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements

As this document’s shepherd, FWIW I think that if the document does 
proceed in the WG it needs significant love and attention. The document 
in its current state is not well written and it would require 
significant labor to resolve its numerous grammar and linguistic issues. 
It’s also very long and if the authors want to continue with it they 
should consider shortening it or breaking it up into multiple more 
targetted drafts.

My $0.02.

-Andrew

On 30 May 2023, at 0:58, Tim Wicinski wrote:

> All,
>
> The chairs want to thank everyone for the feedback on this document
> recently.  We've been in discussions with Warren and the authors about 
> this
> document, and we have some questions we'd like the working group to 
> help us
> resolve.
>
> While this work was relevant when it was first written and adopted, we 
> feel
> that over time the DNSSEC landscape has changed and this document may 
> not
> be as relevant as it once was.
>
> Questions to consider:
>
> Should this draft be removed from the WG?
> Are there fundamental issues that need to be addressed in this 
> document?
> Are there items in the document that should be moved to another 
> document?
>
> The chairs are currently considering abandoning this document in its
> current state.  We'd like to hear from others on this.
>
> We're going to let comments run for two weeks, and wrap up June 12, 
> 2023.
>
> Thanks
> tim
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop