Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 29 March 2017 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CF91296AA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:56:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sRMWDURRPcpg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:56:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4F6129697 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 03:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:48004) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1ctBHA-000cMN-hK (Exim 4.89) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:56:28 +0100
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:56:27 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170329040341.GA27262@isc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1703291154090.13590@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20170328183156.2467.qmail@ary.lan> <20170328205151.GB23312@isc.org> <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD0717CFC@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet> <20170329021935.GA25314@isc.org> <alpine.OSX.2.20.1703282245500.4804@ary.local> <20170329040341.GA27262@isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/vljaCiTSjRM1wO6j5-FD31sVxPw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:56:44 -0000

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> wrote:
>
> At least, please add some operational advice that BULK is not to be
> deployed in any domain unless all auth servers for that domain fully
> implement it.

Yes.

This is fairly similar to the requirement for DNSSEC support on auth
servers, and there wasn't any explicit signalling in the xfer protocol
in that case.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/  -  I xn--zr8h punycode
Southeast Biscay: Easterly or southeasterly 3 or 4. Slight or moderate,
becoming moderate or rough. Fair. Good.