Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format

S Moonesamy <> Sat, 07 July 2018 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850DD130E1C for <>; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 00:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.109
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=oWoSGN5D; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=Vk4/EuUt
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vYdcq4uIzmlG for <>; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 00:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD48E1271FF for <>; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 00:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w677NO75000779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 7 Jul 2018 00:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1530948216; x=1531034616; bh=KOTBRmwQlmghVLvgKQZkI0QDrSDyp4cYTlWXl408Xno=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=oWoSGN5Di4m3yf7jcH1XET5R1SOdYxAY+P1Cx4blTMCWZ7mo69LsbBIeumSjqkphx 7OH1mGuIFxziH40fR2Poe8sI3EtxBH83kvN4ziLyCyhQuseHYbx/9F+sPzffc8uGId HX1DSc+br9R4a7NAZuMltjyY240MJH02/Zd5CHsU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1530948216; x=1531034616;; bh=KOTBRmwQlmghVLvgKQZkI0QDrSDyp4cYTlWXl408Xno=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Vk4/EuUtKcbXD/5gN0eEceBFiXm5qtwkVtjlaFkLep8CtHeKgWqWHvAMXRExox0O6 +h/ncRTn20ci3Pc+KfKmJx40X93Ep75q2jU/vgfqU9TnnpGJUMNpsKOTt9Y5+M0Bt0 h1vU+Mp63TvbAnJpxmzdWRyNAL088vodQU95RZK4=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 00:17:21 -0700
To: Tim Wicinski <>,
From: S Moonesamy <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 07:23:40 -0000

Hi Tim,
At 05:32 PM 06-07-2018, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>One thing which arose early in the process was the issue of IPR and how
>it would be resolved.  The simple answer is that it is resolved farther
>up the process chain.   I spent time reading RFC 3979 on this topic:

That RFC is obsolete.  What is the IPR issue?

S. Moonesamy