Re: [DNSOP] Kindly review draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-05.txt

Stephane Bortzmeyer <> Tue, 28 March 2017 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B92129430 for <>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id itg5AB4KdBwG for <>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A8D127871 for <>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by (Postfix, from userid 10) id C3FC431C7D; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:14:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by godin (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E053FEC0AFC; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 18:12:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:12:17 -0500
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <>
To: "Woodworth, John R" <>
Message-ID: <>
References: <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD06DCF82@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A05B583C828C614EBAD1DA920D92866BD06DCF82@PODCWMBXEX501.ctl.intranet>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 16.04 (xenial)
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Kindly review draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-05.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:14:14 -0000

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:33:50AM +0000,
 Woodworth, John R <> wrote 
 a message of 121 lines which said:

> We welcome _any_ feedback on the draft as we are hoping to have it (or some incarnation) adopted by the WG soon and look to rally more interest around it.

> Q) Does BULK cover all RR types?
> A) No. The draft only covers A, AAAA, PTR and CNAME RR types.

Unless I'm wrong, draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-05.txt does not explain what
to do if the QTYPE=ANY. (Section 3.2 seems to indicate that it will
*not* match even if there are A or AAAA records.)

Also, as I said at the mike, the part about NPN is really difficult to
understand. The pseudo-code is much better. A high-level presentation
of NPN would be a good idea (and a separate draft for NPN).

Anyone willing to do a hackathon project in Prague on implementing