Re: [DNSOP] Moving forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-tld

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> Sun, 01 August 2021 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C503A15C8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=ExhkaFG3; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=HPZmB3Bw
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R_oECtlzeWVj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.yitter.info (mx5.yitter.info [159.203.31.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8353A15CF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 15:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx5.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5F3BD5C5; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 22:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1627857066; bh=PP5TO0ms2zSNVPFwTKsl93HeTM2y06PEM9+UzA2WkCw=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=ExhkaFG374nc99hbmQRYl2gwkqxwJih4E+uoMiUjakiJtP7hlJO34up2eOkavOvfX a+OAQmaMxKHJKjCsptohZNZ5zFMKKOKyUMIL0ijNI2oDV05Ck1y0PGidiHAiOM9VdV fcz/9jGQ8laV+aWxZGNDFqO0wzJiKcBP/Ooxo8/M=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx5.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx5.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njTKk5hSHKwy; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 22:31:02 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1627857062; bh=PP5TO0ms2zSNVPFwTKsl93HeTM2y06PEM9+UzA2WkCw=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=HPZmB3BwouUt9MZzV1mVGP2qXqN19A3oFQUZr93aF92/KXRRJEJmtylDjaCXBCJ4n wu5HSEixpreBnG4cJNQ8VqHtx7U0bhre0mmCYi7wlpuGbnI6V2mpOLj9kDs9mmUNJl CJkCTzM6WOa28iBxJSgJSYzsrvSfiwSRG/F7DSB0=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:30:59 -0400
Message-Id: <336E2DA0-DE91-469C-83E8-3832DC00F360@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <7fde40b9-25d6-9e8d-9419-f8c4efbdf845@bellis.me.uk>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <7fde40b9-25d6-9e8d-9419-f8c4efbdf845@bellis.me.uk>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/vzMzVOStmecETrYGxH_ZuJQBAtk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Moving forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 22:31:13 -0000

Hi,

[Employed by ISOC, speaking for self]

Speaking as usual only for myself, it seems to me that if there were actual demand for a WG that would actually W as a G on actual extensions, it would be pretty trivial to charter it. What would be bad IMO is a “working group” that functioned instead as DNSGATE. But I, of course, don’t have much to contribute one way or the other. 

Best regards,

A

— 
Andrew Sullivan 
Please excuse my clumbsy thums

> On Jul 31, 2021, at 11:48, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 30/07/2021 19:29, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> 
>> We are seeing the WG dropping actual protocol work because of these
>> discussions.
> If only we had a working group for discussing DNS Extensions...
> 
> Ray
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop