IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-davies-internal-tld

Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-6@u-1.phicoh.com> Sat, 03 May 2025 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b6CAFA0C7@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67C52469927 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 3 May 2025 07:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LdMZZUAi2GLC for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Sat, 3 May 2025 07:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [45.83.6.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23479246991F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 May 2025 07:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #158) id m1uBDWf-0000MlC; Sat, 3 May 2025 16:07:33 +0200
Message-Id: <m1uBDWf-0000MlC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b6CAFA0C7@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <1C9E8ABA-4399-491B-A9F4-D9ACCB1BA72C@virtualized.org> <C497EC3A-A06B-4DCC-B0C8-382A3424D7D5@strandkip.nl> <SA1PR15MB43700B9B2C9151FB31381082B3BC2@SA1PR15MB4370.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <866409E5-0D9A-4669-8C6E-C9D1C7BDAA21@dnss.ec> <SA1PR15MB4370BAE2BD669193DDB9AE44B38D2@SA1PR15MB4370.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <20250502171756.5AC67C762C3C@ary.qy> <SA1PR15MB43704113DF8B19A8A5A66AD6B38D2@SA1PR15MB4370.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <4B83E121-9562-449C-A00E-2A31894ADED0@icann.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 2 May 2025 18:26:30 +0000 ." <4B83E121-9562-449C-A00E-2A31894ADED0@icann.org>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2025 16:07:32 +0200
Message-ID-Hash: FIVDK6NSF56WTIFM2JOVWE6GGGN24SIV
X-Message-ID-Hash: FIVDK6NSF56WTIFM2JOVWE6GGGN24SIV
X-MailFrom: pch-b6CAFA0C7@u-1.phicoh.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Call for Adoption: draft-davies-internal-tld
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wPCgWIQfOKrxnOLjJdrSzQhWPjU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

> Saying that .internal being like every other TLD that already does
> not exist today "adds a stumbling block" is absurd. Names that
> don't exist don't exist.

Problem is not with names that do not exist. There are many names that
do not exist today and pose no problems.

The problem starts when a standards track document promotes a name that
does not exist for some purposes.

That's a situation that requires careful handling. Either by not having
such a document in the first place or by making sure that the name
that does not exist can be used safely without manual configuration on
any end-user device that happens to include a DNSSEC validator.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status