[DNSOP] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-09
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 05 July 2024 18:47 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7B4C1840F0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.857
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.857 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="YFHQ+H5Q"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="Hl37Ecqi"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUz_vpL1gf6m for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF95EC1840D9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31488 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2024 18:47:39 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7afa66883fcb.k2407; bh=O/VGw4rard3qbM7Meqo37bdtqv2AgoDDGiXTVDGaAA8=; b=YFHQ+H5Q2s6Id/FOeiAW/YIDxOKV/a1YlKXeIcSrOfOUF1uTN4Mjc26CloZ+JHh3XkVljktoCSsYClDRh2k33oxeVkeqC5RGieTzefOmfX5W386p7Yl5qxz3eIvJPoLx2uJdXfklrxM/j5+EMMlCTum+MrB8fU43r7VfTLmDLR2sN4T531kdWGe7L6DPnsZ7KCxIO4iNGOh/iHUz9Zxr3vkFOrPzaMZ4CyfH9vJ7HTRLL6VSXJ7/PIznMtQLx64Qz23sFpH7lnLyb1vvvvuLwB1QGGVFpRhOtAGiQU/kBWHkaCC/HSsp/pcILk8+7da7Fyz9t07+u2gTEE2WjPmjJQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=7afa66883fcb.k2407; bh=O/VGw4rard3qbM7Meqo37bdtqv2AgoDDGiXTVDGaAA8=; b=Hl37EcqiuVQqnE+JnFFx3TkskF7Na8d7HW3MJfShRwMA52tkcKLuyH0BYKDGCGia6wzfAGXSQtHIb6zz5zMRTF0d1RD4FWzuCBLtS593hYU+RRGl1kijUZz+OVFRg7C1ghwkjM4yDRT6gY5T8F+peO8LeQWiXwAzbJiioFspR/s1ImXyLsef/OgWtTxhMtgU8T1KTw5UwhOQZG7RLe+Rc9FOdjh7GZh4I1e5Txtp6Wu9FlFYzzZfrveymTREFPRIsUdboXMQmKGLJxS9PB0loO7Z0hg0qCGwVyLmHW2mJz2VXvjMuo858UgXkmmNYWLoe/TU0RfDNu1UWQnOH/naGA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 05 Jul 2024 18:47:38 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 704278EDCBC9; Fri, 5 Jul 2024 14:47:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:47:38 -0400
Message-Id: <20240705184738.704278EDCBC9@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5BAB6A8B-8776-4095-9FB7-C28859A58755@isc.org>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <5BAB6A8B-8776-4095-9FB7-C28859A58755@isc.org>
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: IKS2T2O5HQZO5KXTRBP4DP72AGJLSPQD
X-Message-ID-Hash: IKS2T2O5HQZO5KXTRBP4DP72AGJLSPQD
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-09
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wSIwZRyZikYU9OTh8eQP-iWfjJc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
It appears that Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> said: > >What is the reasoning behind the following? Why not just FORMERR the request >when the option length is not zero? How hard do we think writing a client is >that they will get sending a zero length option wrong? What is wrong with >sending back an immediate error signal? There is a thing of being too over >permissive which is why we have so many issues with the DNS today. By golly, he's right. It would be better simply to remove any text about how to respond to invalid options. We write specs to say how to interoperate, not how to work around bugs we guess other people might have. R's, John
- [DNSOP] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-09 Mark Andrews
- [DNSOP] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-09 John Levine