IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 26 March 2019 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FF51203B4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AvBJeIPiMKVm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49AEE1203BF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id g3so11325736wrx.9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KPGk6VgnXWBsu968t+V/maZqds8xd0nU+te521li14g=; b=le9JbnUNcfSoOVLRdOY7JpKeZNNPsvnDb61Gq5DtFH5r9YTA5tjIbuTxeAHnUIh9Q5 O5Vek3bVdWvEUjEVIiqIoBfjr1SXKOv3DbH97xU8O9TvHi3nGOW+MfdRXLPyLWDXaPR5 di3hA/Mw0PDQ2zo9AAwifk04iU+/DVNdvtlfsBC9KImWMjKb7NYHdb2ffa1UAREQkOjU 9plfYVtjEMFLeCbsMuHqypamxTrXgxeUDLH3klbBum4GeUTQjiWK1Q4P487yy4HLgXWJ zy2iCMiac4PMpPv9yVPAQHLWlU/TLDObrQmPpCYSBTFW8hEiW1VVa8i38lXfMYEchq9t 0Mig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KPGk6VgnXWBsu968t+V/maZqds8xd0nU+te521li14g=; b=pqgwmEgZxL2QLkSduCbHYJw7btC6yy9L28kEkMF5Ux95vmKHIiDPmnCufkhwbfskkU H0IA99Az8Qr12XyUrmr9+stU7I/mbUjQ+Jh/26ORashgflBDfpNomqKbARB7QmBs4tNk HQoA55cv9rqpxCpihn7R2lLiELCM6DqFRYXIPVNjjuElblkLsjJMI1eSSrdIgg97gVYq 3EAHkKxaWP9gPlKK9nsP6gtugit6CSx+2hF+xL22+UYolzCpJ3WBuheZ2jgWCSEiinP4 4ntRUyhSBqbtKzveq2FQp07UJpjge/gPGwZYC5BPDgCAK1B4j3IJ/fFxKVnWY03iI+O/ HmbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVpg5/CZFHXf3ywhbpNvnEUoUz6y6nJTwU6cU72l+Z4cEz/Jo/a vJEmoXHUZ4GdRigb09+pUCDqfZpN34U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzrE1h1wH346rKkbHUKySTb6V3Mfn6/1W9RYK7wF7nxnTU5kj8VUIl6PK8No4oyv3McUmt3FA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4e87:: with SMTP id e7mr19262269wru.161.1553613458678; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.151.238] (dhcp-97ee.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.151.238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x17sm45076057wrd.95.2019.03.26.08.17.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57)
In-Reply-To: <CABrJZ5HmCoSsGe2L-JkAsPywhcxyyVkvMmXCvQyJMjWHnMeT_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:17:35 +0100
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D656F1A5-50FF-4AB7-9977-06B8DFD9BF76@gmail.com>
References: <20180919201401.8E0C220051382A@ary.qy> <08C8A740-D09B-4577-AF2A-79225EDB526B@dotat.at> <20180920061343.GA754@jurassic> <E944887D-51ED-41A0-AC5A-3076743620D8@isoc.org> <acef1f69-8e4f-52cc-dca5-3ada9446e0ee@bellis.me.uk> <CABrJZ5HmCoSsGe2L-JkAsPywhcxyyVkvMmXCvQyJMjWHnMeT_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olli Vanhoja <olli@zeit.co>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wUAMBYgygTPDuYYgMztmCciQTxc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:18:15 -0000

No

I said I want to reset and work toward an interim. 

From my high tech gadget

> On Mar 26, 2019, at 15:35, Olli Vanhoja <olli@zeit.co> wrote:
> 
> Did someone say that there will be a side meeting about mvp ANAME
> during this week? If so, I couldn't find that from the calendar.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email