IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Passive DNS - Common Output Format (draft-dulaunoy-kaplan-passive-dns-cof-01)

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Thu, 27 February 2014 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E151A01A6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:38:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6KVGckJrtIb1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:38:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-40-v6.csi.cam.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:212:8::e:f40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C1C1A015A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:38:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:35157) by ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1WJ4uV-0004GW-l6 (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:38:15 +0000
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1WJ4uV-0005jC-HA (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:38:15 +0000
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:38:15 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: "L. Aaron Kaplan" <kaplan@cert.at>
In-Reply-To: <22BA26A2-4423-486C-9886-46F6CAFB43A3@cert.at>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1402271737240.18502@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <52D298FB.3080100@redbarn.org> <52D6E0AB.807@redbarn.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1401161404280.13642@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <80FDE505-1ADC-4451-8A74-51CFFE681A1C@cert.at> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1402271701230.18502@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <22BA26A2-4423-486C-9886-46F6CAFB43A3@cert.at>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wWRPUUIKBKi2CySRkoGrM5jMfr4
Cc: Dulaunoy Alexandre <Alexandre.Dulaunoy@circl.lu>, dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Passive DNS - Common Output Format (draft-dulaunoy-kaplan-passive-dns-cof-01)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 17:38:20 -0000

L. Aaron Kaplan <kaplan@cert.at> wrote:
>
> Since I am the only user of the sensor_id field right now, I'd say we remove the
> text:
>   "The sensor_id is an opaque byte string as defined by RFC 5001 in
>    section 2.3 [RFC5001].  The sensor_id MUST be escaped as defined in
>    section 2.6 of RFC4627 [RFC4627]."
> and just leave:
>   "This field returns the sensor information where the record was seen.
>    This field is represented as a JSON [RFC4627] string."
>
> Would that be OK for you?

I think that makes sense because I can't see any reason to put non-UTF-8
junk in that field.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Humber: Southwest, backing east, 4. Slight, occasionally moderate. Showers.
Good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email