Re: [DNSOP] Proposal for a side-meeting on services centralization at IETF 104 Prague

Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> Mon, 11 March 2019 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E57A1311B8; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NoqPkzFGk8i5; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A774131172; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3927C6A233; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:57:04 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1552327024; bh=Cr2+/+O0KXHWArKL7PokaY1KG5gmsHe/KBNKFF7uGE4=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=spzXFlaVY/IW8NINBcfvwHuoZH8/SN5hzKAa3XvNs5U6l4jFxI8weWQXYZW1wtFr9 HFCpmW5HABqW/M//HTO3q2g94UZp0Vti9Ac9M8z+Cweuz1H7RxME1VlT4J8gfKRm5l pGxWQ0SE/XyI6qM5/EqjMJA9kufk9lT1h+USfacyyOPdT+1g3RaSE6AmLat1wd0f/y Ph0ZH4OAQyUYc7kQykPAtpCyNZr522D7arNUc9VqMzxCh2Vg9HLjsiW0b5LTRFVLDH 8JNOD+TwPgVh8Iyeht96kHam6P8bN7ENnQXi0/YZG17GhCMCXWqmAjz+GGExZZpRDM myGcUhDR1fpQA==
Received: from appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com (appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 191853C06FD; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:57:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:57:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, doh@ietf.org, dns-privacy@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, hrpc@irtf.org
Message-ID: <1829067625.16839.1552327024048@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190311170218.o5hitvysuefhjjxk@nic.fr>
References: <20190311170218.o5hitvysuefhjjxk@nic.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev9
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wcy4LW-pOtfeN8woseEraEpNl_4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Proposal for a side-meeting on services centralization at IETF 104 Prague
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:57:17 -0000

> Il 11 marzo 2019 alle 18.02 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> ha scritto:
> 
> It was suggested <wikipedia>Reference necessary</wikipedia> to have a
> side meeting in Prague at IETF 104. I propose monday, 1400-1600 in
> Tyrolka. The proposal is at
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/104sidemeetings>. You
> are welcome to agree/disagree/meet in a bar instead.

Why not in the Wednesday timeslot that was specifically set aside for side meetings? Also, I'm wondering whether a 40-people room is enough (may be, may be not).

Moreover, centralization is not the only Do*-related problem category that has been raised (my draft alone lists eight others). So the focus of the meeting should be on whether, where and how to deal with all of them, though some of them may later be deemed off mission for the IETF. But first of all we need to agree on a venue and process.

Ciao,
-- 

Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy