Re: [DNSOP] [dns-operations] dnsop-any-notimp violates the DNS standards

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 17 March 2015 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FFB1A0222 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yas9U3Slph1Z for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 529A91A01F9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:55380) by ppsw-51.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1YXok6-0007tm-YW (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:28:58 +0000
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1YXok6-0000V2-Jv (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:28:58 +0000
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:28:58 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Michael Sinatra <michael@brokendns.net>
In-Reply-To: <55077A64.7050906@brokendns.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1503171028210.10193@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20150309110803.4516.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20150309151812.GA14897@xs.powerdns.com> <20150316142350.GB26918@xs.powerdns.com> <55075C41.9000208@brokendns.net> <13D58CB4-95BD-412B-A073-C95617E97BCE@redbarn.org> <55077A64.7050906@brokendns.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/whfjUfphOKkoivxpi3uKrHySBYc>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [dns-operations] dnsop-any-notimp violates the DNS standards
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:29:06 -0000

Michael Sinatra <michael@brokendns.net> wrote:
>
> The other option is to allow the authoritative servers to control what
> gets set out in response to QTYPE=ANY.  But I see devils in the details,
> just as with NOTIMP and other proposals.

What do you think of this?
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg13730.html

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Bailey: Cyclonic becoming south for a time, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 in
northwest. Rough becoming moderate. Occasional rain. Good, occasionally poor.