IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 14 June 2020 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F133A0839 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=bXGfMy6s; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=dgImNqTb
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iy5s0E8OTY1o for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D81283A0528 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 17:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7077 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2020 00:03:55 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1ba2.5ee5696b.k2006; bh=scn3tQZcP3DzclbHJL+ejGnAl4q7djht8ux/YEe6YCc=; b=bXGfMy6s9rxmRakfym0rYRO1CISayMGJaxp926IfN8K2yl6YaRIQ+mG/jUbA9IWjmGAYJEWilp8Qqt1+hgFcN5aHAOEh0w06BRGMwM0zx+UxYnfW7YyDvekT5yV8W/AWdyWCxTyI9GGwF2AQAtFLY9wsI9CEl2VF3Nw8byuHHDSER/oUnXZjUrGFkBhkR35L1Xpn4Mlyd3YdrkifAAGJ70XWP4aoB+Pl3iP1V32GxuhNjx/pH3U69qUrIGnWFy/m
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=1ba2.5ee5696b.k2006; bh=scn3tQZcP3DzclbHJL+ejGnAl4q7djht8ux/YEe6YCc=; b=dgImNqTb00YhxKveSkDjuWFdwbPhPAaRXjzk6AAuataFNlwe6BFlkbaslYsPKg6uUkuXjCAzBtA9DJc2ZtX2I0fhMiM44RdC0txMUZyFWQfEdW/H/7cRcFZWRJLZ0xkqDE5OhkJdqmyhHShLuY/Tg/McAqeA3YyQSGcofrYfzcP2wZM7RjXB+hPzOZJMIkT74jT403FpuUwOcMXxWUvvGsbRaFeHeIsG7QYQgyhe59w7h0b5W7TGfbFewlb8754w
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 14 Jun 2020 00:03:54 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id C79711AA37B6; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:03:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 20:03:54 -0400
Message-Id: <20200614000354.C79711AA37B6@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8BF10121-CF4B-4341-BC40-F427A8F4B50A@apnic.net>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wjJIvtcbw0Yj8988zMgYT2PpQGU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-arends-private-use-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 00:04:00 -0000

In article <8BF10121-CF4B-4341-BC40-F427A8F4B50A@apnic.net> you write:
>This is likely to be a Fine Proposal, worthy of serious consideration, but the venue where such
>topics should be considered is elsewhere, in my view. I realise that explicitly opposing such WG
>calls for adoption is tantamount to heresy in today’s IETF, but nevertheless I must record my
>opposition to adoption.

Agreed. The proposal is technically fine but for better or worse,
ICANN is in charge of the TLD namespace these days.

If something else like .onion that has a technical aspect comes along,
we can probably deal with that, with ICANN's tacit cooperation, but I
wouldn't push it.

R's,
JOhn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email