Re: [DNSOP] Special Use Names Summary
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 13 October 2016 14:20 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF5A1298D4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id De-OvJ7evY6E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C3F129467 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id b81so136397501lfe.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Wb0E9tL1jW93S+wEx1k8m0HAgXhp0EHzKGqSpm6AePA=; b=w9ZMzmRRg5Q1AcyBGsP7zl2XUz1xlF1XbvPtvptA3a3qr/+ii9Sre6BZ1LdaayZW2X CYGzWEvnAmFXejMvuvLOseDfGf34DNsb68JYMOL852XN/t9AlQ53ujt9am0tIxNksX9c aif0W4eS2VMOXF7nz9VLnYyC+03PK6QkTz/VW1GjNUFze8y99GWuTC2EI4SajMgGI7XX MTsV0SiAh9aHDxVK9tjlIgiBwe6X7DS1rnevnGCn/YuZ7jvXuW+pfopSXOMTyMNhsVGE xGluThsVsCr0xdKIbGGeGm3dUqhGKafQz6BWE7QB/1FdDCNCQYIwIJdnI5pKA4V8w0m+ LuDw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wb0E9tL1jW93S+wEx1k8m0HAgXhp0EHzKGqSpm6AePA=; b=MJ7aj0PDTslePWQFZ8Wj/IIZSeROBX8J5OQh3Y5Oph3CDBwFofuLbK+LKTx5xSs3sj OO0ByZ76R96n+RtIUMF2CQVsrJfUINVkHnejkfQeJjHNal3wtB5sK13JexgQrrBU9A0y byc01fYo5HkLUXr65kMtb139QQqc+NzuLeMCdhQMwRkuh3kpVVjuhmE4Fjrg7Zxuhm/n 47zQ79IvJDpK3qZvdfcZr4ayIBcYBrvQyyv/lp/kW5nu3pJIjVdmzJOdSModCEjMyV3j Bg1SCJdE0dj9yoB8Z+6eHdoFo9iV1EJRxrVuEWXbh5zqO5CYVD+9x2avFWZg2iKO3z03 hY/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnV6rrvMppzf8dTYqiFD/wLxK5LuHCIwUBVXQJpF3rNlrrX8x1jf+xtiAyxBb7H1JhTrOU5yIFbE5vRrg==
X-Received: by 10.25.161.7 with SMTP id k7mr10315486lfe.56.1476368430417; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 07:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <74d5776a-ae09-a851-045d-a7071fa9cf13@gnu.org>
References: <8537d6bb-c77f-77da-6530-1650a54cef34@gmail.com> <74d5776a-ae09-a851-045d-a7071fa9cf13@gnu.org>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 10:19:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kUOYSDUFtCn1NMWn0bVOOd_PHSrHM8qWmjxQbP+bEb8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/woSij4v-sRNBtzTIDDu1Ph64Vno>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Special Use Names Summary
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 14:20:36 -0000
New version of tldr draft is in the works. When done, criticism solicited. Please, please bear in mind that the point of this document is not to say what to do, but merely to enumerate as complete a set of problems as we can enumerate. The point is not that we are going to solve every one of the problem documented in the draft, but that we want to identify all the problems people consider important, so that when we start to think about solutions, we can systematically evaluate how each part of a solution would impact each of the problems we've identified. On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:44 AM, hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org> wrote: > On 10/07/2016 08:56 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: >> >> Special Use Names Summary >> > > Hello DNSOP WG, > > I let a week pass so that others can comment, but apparently this > summary didn't bring much of them. Indeed I have a troubling issue with > it: how is that actionable? IOW, what's next? > > Thank you, > > == > hk > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] Special Use Names Summary Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Special Use Names Summary joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] Special Use Names Summary hellekin
- Re: [DNSOP] Special Use Names Summary Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] Special Use Names Summary Suzanne Woolf