Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] Proposal for a side-meeting on services centralization at IETF 104 Prague

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 11 March 2019 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91062131170; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p2PBxwxZzh-Z; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB741311C3; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id x3so4725205ior.6; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hBL+pZn6F+etxZjx/nvsHmqsNO1Pb/kvX4kq+ad6fGA=; b=veCzGN1quZRq5+NnH+J9YKPz20TBTWoq1dHtoVvSlcSI2r7LZgvtNXmKZ6lHXZGkuf jEexW3VqxNR0tLjhudA5o8OMy+THIRafemE47vP0P+KxSJGKCXIeFDU2eNuUNeTqPuKC tZbosyp30r7Y78IvowIvX6sj1qcZ2wA4b00GENi+adL5ojtHWDkicOObPMpWr/Gg4R5w 6R4DnFq9ly2MH9ZpTqyR9sXNUmdk1eyVPwqwQQnC0tT0kXIY8VIngwI2hRdIHnrJoUou pFLeq9m6ofKb40AF+AlGBT/6VLxRrvnw3OvFi34a6QFcCU6py3Wic+KdI7z5bOlxlmd6 cv7A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hBL+pZn6F+etxZjx/nvsHmqsNO1Pb/kvX4kq+ad6fGA=; b=PAWPPEawTm4mLonLjQKFqKoKHwRE98kwM2pnQvdTul9+Vz8ErlfVr/cKpltGJC6HZk mr0/W0iYlfNupVkaK9YXOWfnxJgL/Xugeu8y5UmR8Oh8gWiQQ7PwgCeBgtY6FhgkvXwi 6OrW8HGFGY2exjqaQOJakMO9Yr7H6wmoQK3E2ID0NE2zKN09wrGKNuXvtU1HaQprIf82 CboSIqLQHfTUOckGEefCRZUUCX7fz9TEpFNAIAJk26eX/2TmkeRJM/QhFClFQmhEwpbf Mm2wioStEWI0fG01P12mhY5Tw+1Glpv27r3y7l6DOdLXpQdv+gz9OQ95MGo1nyY0K1p9 ygfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU8r8sG7AhcgoQ0MH1VdBh0HBTbrM2jipyKp9uvJBYDn99hNtHt mDFkxei+mH+U3ySMbYBzBNq3eBG2TREvu2RT1FTkpusn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyngtt2zQCvIFtjSBOWpfiHBD93OCmMKPE9kYlnk+JYTMCsrg6vubm2uvf5vClgwW12tGiC71+0ML3AdeglJFI=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c543:: with SMTP id v64mr17872643iof.6.1552324727096; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190311165813.ilrz5ocxomraavbq@nic.fr> <CA+9kkMDawXJdC4fPihRbL0Ov6Fo4kUmp=RQMRiNzDLnyPLJGow@mail.gmail.com> <20190311171338.kusmt6q2z7mx6dww@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20190311171338.kusmt6q2z7mx6dww@nic.fr>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:18:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBagyqxg_EovvVSuGaf1gvXE4rmDye77Kk61gO4QrNREA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, dns-privacy@ietf.org, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, hrpc@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ef78d00583d4c3c2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wu-LvWXfstUll3EsP4SyaEr6qkg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] Proposal for a side-meeting on services centralization at IETF 104 Prague
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:19:01 -0000

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:13 AM Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:06:21AM -0700,
>  Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote
>  a message of 76 lines which said:
>
> > This conflicts with SECDISPATCH, which will have a pretty serious impact
> on
> > who might attend.  Scheduling these things is very hard, obviously. Given
> > this topic, you may have to move outside the normal agenda time to get a
> > reasonable shot at avoiding conflict.
>
> I avoided conflicts with doh, dprive, dnsop and hrpc but avoiding all
> conflicts is close-to-impossible. In the evening, people have
> meetings, too.
>
> I admit I'm not sure that Secdispatch is so important here. The
> subject of the side meeting is not security-specific.
>

It is certainly not only about security, but there are several important
security trade-offs in play with these choices.  Secdispatch pulls pretty
much the entire Security Area, and a conflict seems to me personally very
unfortunate in its scope.

regards,

Ted