[DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not only home residental networks ...

"Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info> Fri, 01 September 2017 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D10C132D5A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 12:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.821
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mathemainzel.info
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dmo2O8eKsic4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 12:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx18lb.world4you.com (mx18lb.world4you.com [81.19.149.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2799E1344B8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 12:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mathemainzel.info; s=dkim11; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=ggcSH7gj2pwxU7x9FszOPdsSEJHoAWGlyjkfTasiynk=; b=w2fv/42WzpmAL9DSK4J1IR0KB0XXpzafHSw12DxBoa7Gg/v51eyZ4MDIhGozAzyMBYi5NFgcGDPnvMxlKliL0OGuxuBCBb/KkyrFfpQzBn/J+rVIkEGxTJOlpAuNL2z3FRhTUGJtE7QJy5LgEnXoI13ttY2JISX2lzgyiTjgDPk=;
Received: from [90.146.55.206] (helo=home.mail) by mx18lb.world4you.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>) id 1dnrmb-0001qD-Bx for dnsop@ietf.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 21:39:13 +0200
Message-ID: <59A9B760.2060209@mathemainzel.info>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 21:39:12 +0200
From: "Walter H." <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info>
Organization: Home
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (UNIX; U; Cray X-MP/48; en-US; rv:2.70) Gecko/20110929 Communicator/7.20
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <150428805872.6417.9525310755360551475@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150428805872.6417.9525310755360551475@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms040409090800040607060602"
X-SA-Do-Not-Run: Yes
X-AV-Do-Run: Yes
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 90.146.55.206
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Walter.H@mathemainzel.info
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mx18lb.world4you.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ww-FbSp3Nj6Oa4VWIEUcM62hnZM>
Subject: [DNSOP] DNS names for local networks - not only home residental networks ...
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 19:39:18 -0000

Hello,

in the draft
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-homenet-dot-14

I read this line

"The domain name 'home.arpa.' is to be used for naming within
residential homenets."

when this draft becomes an RFC - hopefully this year 2017 - then there 
exists
an RFC, which gives you a domain name you can use in a home network/LAN
without conflicting to other things ..., the domain name 'home.arpa'

but there still doesn't exist any for company networks, they most 
commonly use
the domain name 'local', which I already noticed, that this conflicts to 
RFC 6762 ...

Thanks,
Walter

>> On 01.09.2017 20:47, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>> On Sep 1, 2017, at 2:46 PM, Walter H. <Walter.H@mathemainzel.info> wrote:
>>>> but there still doesn't exist any for company networks, they most commonly use
>>>> the domain name 'local', which I already noticed, that this conflicts to RFC 6762 ...
>>> That problem is not within the scope of the homenet working group to address.   You might consider raising it in the dnsop working group.
>

On 01.09.2017 19:47, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Home Networking WG of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : Special Use Domain 'home.arpa.'
>          Authors         : Pierre Pfister
>                            Ted Lemon
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-homenet-dot-14.txt
> 	Pages           : 11
> 	Date            : 2017-09-01
>