Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: QNAME

"Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Wed, 03 January 2018 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02435127AD4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 08:15:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YUax09Mzqw7h for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 08:15:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 846F81200B9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 08:15:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 952A46A46C; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:15:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8653C1E97; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:15:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from open-xchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap.open-xchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j1ePqMnspQlW; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:15:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.242.2.41] (095-096-086-198.static.chello.nl [95.96.86.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52D4D3C1E84; Wed, 3 Jan 2018 17:15:03 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 17:15:02 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.10r5443)
Message-ID: <28F2C60E-5971-4FF7-8D55-D633C040455A@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <F8509291-AAA0-49FC-BF84-21C3ECAF9813@vpnc.org>
References: <F8509291-AAA0-49FC-BF84-21C3ECAF9813@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wzBIlXTTOWCb96B3cXC48hR-hEA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Please review in terminology-bis: QNAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 16:15:09 -0000

On 11 Dec 2017, at 16:30, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Greetings again.
>
> Some of the new terms added to the terminology-bis draft 
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/)since 
> RFC 7719 can expose what some (but not all) people perceive as lack of 
> clarity in RFC 1034/1035. This week, we hope you will look at the 
> definition in the draft for "QNAME".
> Please review the lengthy explanation and comment on the list if you 
> think the definition should change.

+1 on the lengthy explanation. Nothing shorter could settle this thing.

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/