Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-12

Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org> Fri, 04 May 2018 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ondrej@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31631127201 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2018 01:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OM5ysTs1qmah for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2018 01:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0D81241FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2018 01:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A79A3AB068; Fri, 4 May 2018 08:04:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FDB7160069; Fri, 4 May 2018 08:04:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E54C16006B; Fri, 4 May 2018 08:04:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id lyR85ZLe0xVq; Fri, 4 May 2018 08:04:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.10.0.193] (40.20.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.20.40]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A664160069; Fri, 4 May 2018 08:04:16 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
From: =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= <ondrej@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <5E7C31BE-EA5F-4A68-96FE-975CFAF77E42@apnic.net>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2018 10:04:13 +0200
Cc: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2376827B-F8BE-46DE-8833-0DB50867A53D@isc.org>
References: <CADyWQ+EE9YCCM03wKvd-HefpoQVqhOfeeLKLV8L2LJj+tqmEzA@mail.gmail.com> <CACWOCC936z-4j8e+d7bvhfr_Mk8tk64tkuiRDTRtrqrBTJBKJw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLgTvPHe5jeL-0QZJ4+cxes8bBpCEULuDKThpjXoKzrbA@mail.gmail.com> <20180406134501.GC49550@vurt.meerval.net> <4A943DE7-81BC-41AC-93F7-4EC0975DF6B6@gmail.com> <5E7C31BE-EA5F-4A68-96FE-975CFAF77E42@apnic.net>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/x-J6vP7uuyqkiUUO9qYjjcwWv84>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-12
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 08:04:25 -0000

I reviewed the -11 to -12 changes and they look good to me.

The document is ready to go in my opinion.

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ondrej@isc.org

> On 3 May 2018, at 10:15, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi WG Chairs (and WG)
> 
> We have submitted -12 of this draft which we believe incorperates the substantive review comments made during the WG Last Call period that were posted to the WG Mailing List.
>> 
>> Editors: Please take “concern about a description of current implementation status” as WGLC input, and consider what you might be able to add to the draft to address it. 
> 
> We have also taken the implementation comments posted to the WG mailing list and collected them in a new section titled "Implementation Experience” in the light of Suzanne’s request
> 
> So we would like to pass this draft back to the WG Chairs at this point for your review for potential submission as an RFC.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Geoff (for co-editors Joao and Warren)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop