IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-large-resp

"Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB996129741 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:41:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CWpU4BLxxHm4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:41:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D3C612D827 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 06:41:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from open-xchange.com (unknown [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D208C6A24B; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:41:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.242.2.79] (unknown [10.242.2.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F61B3C0B4B; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:41:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 15:41:04 +0100
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.4r5594)
Message-ID: <3B046CC4-B67E-4960-9950-527169060AFD@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190206080832.GA14062@jurassic.lan.banu.com>
References: <BCACF554-8BE6-49BC-B75A-BCED776F5189@NLnetLabs.nl> <20190206080832.GA14062@jurassic.lan.banu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/x7ePfBPF1HTWIfD83O0QxYrLX24>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-song-atr-large-resp
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 14:41:25 -0000

On 6 Feb 2019, at 9:08, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:

> Considering that the method is implementable without any changes at a
> resolver, and that it doesn't require compatible behavior among DNS
> implementations ("protocol" or best practice), I suppose it does not
> matter if this draft is adopted or not as long as the idea has been
> described somewhere.

While it can be implemented on an auth without changes to resolvers, 
doing that would severely impact operation of all resolvers.

I think it’s important to repeat that not only do I oppose adoption - 
any implementation, no matter the status of the document, will be 
*actively harmful to the DNS at large*. Please do not implement this.

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email