[DNSOP] Document Action: 'AS112 Nameserver Operations' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-06.txt)
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> Mon, 02 March 2015 15:34 UTC
Return-Path: <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E441A1BA3; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 07:34:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iv2zJzcmzvp0; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 07:34:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ECB1A8877; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 07:34:18 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.12.0.p1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150302153418.25968.28762.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 07:34:18 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xIWtK9RnUqWm3g5Co9w3mIuJzDM>
Cc: dnsop mailing list <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop chair <dnsop-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [DNSOP] Document Action: 'AS112 Nameserver Operations' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:34:30 -0000
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'AS112 Nameserver Operations' (draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-06.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Benoit Claise and Joel Jaeggli. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis/ Technical Summary Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses that are not globally-unique. Examples are the addresses designated in RFC 1918 for private use within individual sites. Devices in such environments may occasionally originate Domain Name System (DNS) queries (so-called "reverse lookups") corresponding to those private-use addresses. Since the addresses concerned have only local significance, it is good practice for site administrators to ensure that such queries are answered locally. However, it is not uncommon for such queries to follow the normal delegation path in the public DNS instead of being answered within the site. It is not possible for public DNS servers to give useful answers to such queries. In addition, due to the wide deployment of private-use addresses and the continuing growth of the Internet, the volume of such queries is large and growing. The AS112 project aims to provide a distributed sink for such queries in order to reduce the load on the corresponding authoritative servers. The AS112 project is named after the Autonomous System Number (ASN) that was assigned to it. RFC6304 described the steps required to install a new AS112 node, and offered advice relating to such a node's operation. This document updates that advice to facilitate the addition and removal of zones for which query traffic will be sunk at AS112 nodes, using DNAME, whilst still supporting direct delegations to AS112 name servers. Working Group Summary Since this document was an update of RFC 6304, the point was raised that the Internet had changed some and that there were better mechanisms to aid in these configurations. Specially around IPv6 transport, and also to allow for using DNAME. The outcome of this discussion was draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-03. Document Quality Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a The document updates an existing RFC that has gone through the IETF RFC editorial process and is reflecting changing best practices. Therefore existing implementations exist, and have been observed for some time. Personnel The Document Shepherd is Tim Wicinski. The dnsop working group chairs are Tim Wicinski and Suzanne Woolf. The Area Director is Joel Jaggeli.