IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Going forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-use

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Fri, 06 November 2020 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342763A0954 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:18:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13ZcyjTeMlmP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:18:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 560CF3A0944 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:18:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:35028) by ppsw-40.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.138]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1kapSf-000Ize-jD (Exim 4.92.3) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:18:37 +0000
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:18:36 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
cc: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.23.451.2011021215330.2672107@bofh.nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011060018280.20609@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <8E19F8FE-D15D-4731-B8FB-EC1695819857@dnss.ec> <alpine.LRH.2.23.451.2011021215330.2672107@bofh.nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xTQgKFwV21zlYPv-CofaxsqQ8GU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Going forward on draft-ietf-dnsop-private-use
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:18:43 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
>
> The IETF / DNSOP should not recommend setting up private space TLDs by
> instructing people how to do this.

+1

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Fisher: West or northwest 4 to 6, becoming variable 2 to 4 later. Moderate or
rough. Fair. Good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email