IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com> Tue, 18 February 2020 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ericorth@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F014C120802 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:07:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sYbBdybSXHF2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:07:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com (mail-wm1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FA7312011D for <DNSOP@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:07:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id a5so3747957wmb.0 for <DNSOP@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:07:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lis57lVIjdzvO39EvQfMB6zi/yd0aKCiTOwYFBTxNKY=; b=GzPOQ+r6fnnfaR754a/3wlt6BImvu751amlVy4E1425nAw7OEyawqPzgYEn8JdSOWW tj5LoCZVwbWpUzndkN7i8Mj8AWP88NoKsrO0BlaSgu42hOYltFH5JhCiQJW9xLa51iO7 QKVbAQ61roEsGSBHuLMy09nvB+T575TPzBtagTBLdnLtFlZaTQQlE8aTCQccvzp30M5w 5bJGCNNJiEpOxpRWV76+XD5XNv/MEIq/YVku5jPRcBFD0mGNdGdYV9B4bi0xJ/ECWIWn 5AZXmeDFk8++t4VcGRDHIxFNRecWxwjQyFNi9kJSr1LnlmXxiTuzQ7/3BxHZsK01MaR+ y0aA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lis57lVIjdzvO39EvQfMB6zi/yd0aKCiTOwYFBTxNKY=; b=Tsn8qEgbhyCTzxyUwJf+XF7OdZ+DhUH4X2OXG1UnmZVyuM2e7FYLzrp5EVy1HW9Vel QxkZriMn383fjQ1Xa6shD7OXs9E7Y9kUUtZbXCBf5AvmMEqTCqGtPuPPq5cyEdDYn2HZ xXw3j4fkJ8qZ2y8tDDYZ5aO2jpcyRLFIJkUG3we1I7xMvO6AKPck4oC39zpzM8u6ONr3 5UGlQnBEB0mOFGX9HDxa1oJTk73DLqoEt0rMANCYPCKq+HERUJChtGIS57w13UiwGsWy F4gU1KDTBiEycFa5DMK2G7/PE3rpFIwrNtm0P/t39dxpcBbnLEn4JJX4gfitbVixisbY 6gOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUv2tEKgjwSyE8F6wXdTtuudc9d/xIeEHUKeus1nhXHFTLyve7H jNvkbZHl6OmRhOG5R8GyXjVY81BdCzoAn8fDlmtHcg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxf8FZFBNvJxQB7UKWXfTVDBWzqLyppUpJZFs9dm6lM4RnVlv+XmUVwkYuLhBiFZXJ9P2Z5Q9HEmy6VtPzitBo=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2406:: with SMTP id 6mr4453659wmp.30.1582049233740; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 10:07:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b34f1b0d-fa65-23d4-1b2b-761b965a2aae@knipp.de> <CAG8jCEzO7zrfL5G5CzdJ=c5wipJgqqHfyeA-a3-QjquoyPYgvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG8jCEzO7zrfL5G5CzdJ=c5wipJgqqHfyeA-a3-QjquoyPYgvg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:07:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMOjQcFGXEQNY5dWrH+yc4uvvJfU8BuS43cmo1mpgh_Di=J37w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olli Vanhoja <olli.vanhoja@gmail.com>
Cc: Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de>, dnsop <DNSOP@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000098b0ba059edd8a7e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xXOLIEFGxs25eE8H5Q5ZzzVH_fE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:07:21 -0000

Hasn't been discussed much lately on this list (I keep meaning to get back
to the chain-length discussion from a month or so back), but SVCB is
definitely very much still alive.  Lots of work is going on in its github
to prepare the next draft, so I assume we'll have another round of
discussions here soon whenever that is ready.

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:17 AM Olli Vanhoja <olli.vanhoja@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 16:20 Klaus Malorny <Klaus.Malorny@knipp.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> I asked myself about the status of the two drafts. I got the impression a
>> little
>> bit that the svcb/httpsvc draft successfully killed the aname draft, but
>> is now
>> dying slowly itself. It would be great if somebody could give me some
>> insight
>> whether the one or the other has still a measurable heartbeat, to stay
>> with the
>> allegories ;-)
>>
>
> SVCB is active almost every day of the week in GitHub.
>
> I can't talk on behalf of the authors of the ANAME draft, but to me it
> seems that SVCB is getting more traction and it addresses the core problems
> that ANAME was supposed to solve.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email