IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-02.txt

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 28 July 2021 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30B43A1406 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Oqj+SjhH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=APQwXydl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y62YR8ScJehW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 443323A13F3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 34059 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2021 00:47:24 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=8509.6100a91c.k2107; bh=4SNbf/62vwRLRHu0uonR60Cuge64ShXwvjOAmbdlyP0=; b=Oqj+SjhHZ6OqzZVoHHr8pBuMzQDvc0wPcOId45tMBC6hzxzIW9vsSE39bNn3AvDA8bWeMQ2sAZpQIcN6JLl4GrK85FfWSlK52w/vHE3j2GFvUCniI6WJ8PqBqn9KeDJWNCX84+ps+OKI6tTDiCb2m0CEvAl2QWfHtf2HdA7t2PmaYIDsd/GEC500vl0VvUUO4eM8h+8gKEQmt72YwEfkhXLWeqJfhmT4xkmQ5WmhsaMd4LG2L5anMTmmhNOHN/hDacEc3Obgi2JxhcLEfNCBygXNs+FaHsHC3pNUV3YBh+qngNdHQLZ8KoYk+oBTGMpGbfee3qU01p0ElB60amUykg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=8509.6100a91c.k2107; bh=4SNbf/62vwRLRHu0uonR60Cuge64ShXwvjOAmbdlyP0=; b=APQwXydlVC0BHAAHJiAoWxeShEp1ePKQMB1uorVdLJoBTnAa9T2V+cGGHLi75WQH/v4ocmZ6m2RE4f0nWLC0mAk0CIRJXH/eB7F8rBIicna8yS8CEdrt7xRXQfcl4jNjdgm6a9Ufaf0BUGymDuRkGSBjBrVTmEVqgDmpvXSbdW9HY1Y0OiNxwve7EhCy/ZHqNPwEkIqdBkS9st4lXv35b+dppcKnBkx+k052vPXBg8cO3qLzOSSd3oAhm517r0lEd2rLkgxkSs6sw3nhjBHbqvOQhZkpJ5e+kyslCWpiCx487byr4FtSPYQoN4+rEhxaPBBJ4FJRSrn1CwI0LvGmGg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 28 Jul 2021 00:47:24 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 63C372539492; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:47:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB40D2539474; Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:47:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:47:23 -0400
Message-ID: <3ecabc6b-9e7e-a936-5ac7-dc7e4ce08fc8@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Shumon Huque <shuque@gmail.com>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <CAHPuVdV82N5m3z2BMuh3GxH_0e+PSUjG8ty4-7b8RGQr8MzMag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9_gVstayRZufjKbi3TgKxnsg-Jt52y1Z3Znnmocyf_iSdoiQ@mail.gmail.com> <20210727201504.2939B25365A4@ary.qy> <CAHPuVdX4jwn=U9ONkuGd_LU0cgcGVyNpy7=aHnjqtX8MHTj2tg@mail.gmail.com> <4897dd4-7199-c32b-53d0-67a357b2f1e1@taugh.com> <CAHPuVdV82N5m3z2BMuh3GxH_0e+PSUjG8ty4-7b8RGQr8MzMag@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xZ02S8JTOxgM-VbxyHVWvqfd714>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 00:47:37 -0000

>>> Just to make sure we're talking about the same thing, the definition of
>>> sibling glue is glue from another zone delegated from the same parent.
>>
>> That's not what the example in 4.1 of the draft shows.  It has foo.test
>> depending on ns1.bar.test, so the server adds the A record for
>> ns1.bar.test.
>
> It does actually.

Oh, sorry, I misread your message.

> "ns1.bar.test/A" is glue for "bar.test" (and sibling glue for "foo.test" in that
> example). It is returned by the servers for "test" in a referral for "foo.test".
>
> Open to suggestions for more clarifying language.

Unless I'm misunderstanding something, in the absence of sibling glue, the 
resolver would make a second request for ns1.bar.test, same as if it were 
ns1.bar.otherdomain, and it would get back a referral with the glue.  It 
is just a performance tweak and I don't see why we should describe it as 
more than that.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email