Re: [DNSOP] More for the WG Last Call on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 27 May 2015 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7D01A896B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGBhzRCyEUKt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D071A8972 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qkx62 with SMTP id 62so8041690qkx.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2LF7UH7318hC7fPJCrYSTidvJO00s/ygUmj6IkfY+jA=; b=ZZK9j/SA94Uypr7ZbkILuFDUbTCMJIVLUQfY0LuMLS3KFp0VKXrdWmtsSro7KBpgwP ptXlvQfscu1FvBQALf8pFslFl/lI+uKs+yQ9+d2dwiE5oV0DGRl6aHKQxT0WzqBU9xpe ZvnCA+tR1wPO14TbqaykZaHhAfMLV8SwTIKwt73gZ0dC2rRnxESFSlie7OfJSwn5f5qC oC9SXPP6bHj6nhtfddFra73RQA55eU6hjtzPtWirViJdjrF9afkKsM9iXhQozAeQdQaI sJ9PTSjB3fN0pg/MYMyAtLivD78rkrLKTzRWUCTxLdHIY058FezWJlK9ANaYjTar3z+e /sKA==
X-Received: by 10.140.235.77 with SMTP id g74mr3827193qhc.64.1432742014007; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from still.local (184-19-93-177.drr03.clbg.wv.frontiernet.net. [184.19.93.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 139sm9285252qhs.5.2015.05.27.08.53.32 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 May 2015 08:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <905B446A-CACE-46A1-8575-5F0DE34D9022@vpnc.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5565E87B.8010804@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:53:31 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/40.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <905B446A-CACE-46A1-8575-5F0DE34D9022@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xeP5r-d5hN-o3T87CcLIS08A5yw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] More for the WG Last Call on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:54:10 -0000

I want to thank the authors for keeping up with all the comments and 
conversations on this draft, and putting together a new version.

We'd like to see some folks who have contributed text and opinions on 
this draft to spend a few moments reviewing the list of changes.

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-01&url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-02

The previous WGLC date was 22 May 2015, but there was a delay in getting 
a new version published.  We want to push the WGLC to Friday, 5 June 2015.

thanks
tim


On 5/26/15 11:40 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings again, and apologies for the long lag on getting the new draft out. It has a *lot* of changes based on what we heard in the WG Last Call, and we need to be sure that we haven't messed anything up in the changes. Please review the diffs here:
>     https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-02
>
> Many of those diffs are just a change to make it clear where one definition stops and when another begins with better indentation, but many of them are new definitions or clarifications. Thus, a careful read is important to us.
>
> We also have three outstanding questions from the earlier review:
>
> 1) Possibly add back in NXDOMAIN?
>
> 2) Remove "Child-centric resolver" ?
>
> 3) Add: DNS operator: an entity responsible for running DNS servers. For a zone's authoritative
> servers, the registrant may act as their own DNS operator, or their registrar may do it on
> their behalf, or they may use a third-party operator.
>
> If we do (1), we need to have full agreement on what it is, and I don't think we can get that in a short period of time. I think (2) should be done because it isn't needed for the rest of the document, and can be added in a -bis document. The addition for (3) seemed to have good support, but we need to be sure.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>