Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 04:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33454129B25 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:09:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDxcuSXbdDqO for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:09:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F1DD129B23 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:09:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x1so37930470lff.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 20:09:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pZvCmDAfq9mIM51nWFbIINWqTa2uGCNilovZ2KP5Bi8=; b=wH7xTdP0KafTTKT+89Rth5c7VTXo9RNk+pLr+1lGY/lKfHi26Fak0nZ2fqEMQWoY3U iKkJcYoHbfkZwq9pJo+ohFfnGt0yZKrwdi2GaGxrrNjDJfOhtM96NOT7Dk+rhHepeeX3 fpZWj1T+7sd/RfCDQlycuRuiOiEdS17ijRgzrWxmFx1JI77i0VqESd2lDrmPfp+TREWT NagKYi+MblnLGZfnAvTq8269EdoqL9YmCNd3kIIYlQyFHOFhYbLHs94+w9OgQS2lD8SN ZBV77s2QrgRr0/0EHXkpRVjHcmbxsVeYS4qEbsoxOIxzCK//qxYm+mkMscGoraO5bSOK xqhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pZvCmDAfq9mIM51nWFbIINWqTa2uGCNilovZ2KP5Bi8=; b=ax0IHIWZDyXDoXR9Yqkm5OJIvlO5ZaQJ4G+zWJ6ZA38zK4NwB5dPL/12vh2c0INAdt F4+lrj9cqhh6URV5mUDyjOYSpB665UhIoZRhEiDy85ZoQdJCnzA7UzuNOcZY+twqyo1S DUsYH9Zk5x1w1xO3+Y+qbGKG//TmAFzdmro24tU4iKx0Fz0mXkSYlH6OoJhTSfFl1JB5 UiNAUt+WJj4adbWy5GqIgKFWhxwvotMlLW/QpLfKK0mWkgN3pHOAuySE/kT7Mpl8eUky hr6TurR0q+MiRjwphUVCNheRQPVFm/I/GgoyT3gnzQtbVr5wQ4px3U0GZRnEoRPJ2wDu lmXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ5dVovFWooHGN9QgdmPxMRoTvOHo7qMMuvagBVqX0ZXxuLBRq8dgZI25Z4SKtabJ/6GsURNyLqHkKUwg==
X-Received: by 10.25.215.103 with SMTP id o100mr2694724lfg.126.1486354164347; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 20:09:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.20.67 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:09:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.20.67 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:09:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170206040516.1701.qmail@ary.lan>
References: <6391B5BB-19BD-4717-B9BB-ECD145F7B4F6@fugue.com> <20170206040516.1701.qmail@ary.lan>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 23:09:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mbzhS19G_uDA8HokVxXuHy5uA7F1c84-1yUUpqZ2ifJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140e192fa0bab0547d4cb48"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xhvDowkmqAM79TZjKLctS5IZiBE>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] ALT-TLD and (insecure) delgations.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 04:09:28 -0000

I'm pretty sure I've explained it enough times on this mailing list and in
the relevant documents by now. If you don't agree, maybe we should just
accept that. If you don't remember the explanation, it's in the homenet
naming architecture doc I wrote.

On Feb 5, 2017 11:05 PM, "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <6391B5BB-19BD-4717-B9BB-ECD145F7B4F6@fugue.com> you write:
> >On Feb 5, 2017, at 9:51 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:
> >> What is wrong with homenet.arpa ?
> >
> >homenet.arpa sounds like a service out there on the arpanet somewhere,
> not something local.
>
> Why would that be important?  It's mostly managed automatically.
>
>