Re: [DNSOP] raising the bar: requiring implementations

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Wed, 28 March 2018 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8B71273B1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zGTxJcl_Ka-t for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x22e.google.com (mail-ot0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C586127369 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id h55-v6so1661202ote.9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QaDvWEzSPwTZ8UHzJ4HpgMLgqXvIuXocVaiaK5EY/gM=; b=P2kjZSLJH1EqUYSZaMHnN23tKG+PcU4gHzFb4pt4cfaw34rs+fApiB9deLenSfe6E2 HJAveOUXZqOz3YeoA9PtlSXvCIJCOJhJmsQ183nmFQ7+zk5GRUXp20eN4cXfSjBPrh1N 3jrjE2LEIBJORvyaiEw7LCzewRkg86HksW2PaA2RULeWCnRnOBcSWBlmoAH4bFdDLnm+ 9PbKe3MPRUZ+ZEEuOIRfa9zoGEsR1TwdIeZKI7hWTGl238UU/x47Djkik06mOR91lDOB BtdFUvjRcPu5S6UsSMI3ot/+7LnPk+uITQ+QRG0u9cIA94jdjY7pAFpgaZirpXi0dHzN RUFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QaDvWEzSPwTZ8UHzJ4HpgMLgqXvIuXocVaiaK5EY/gM=; b=mstcuojE3f5la28t7jsUPwI13FjtfuxfzqfrVvBS4hixSxyP2nsCClnqKwatLYAWwF GItt4xvpyvdCp8lgDUQj89ebOiRQfE9/WeSbfauKBnTDyJrGxBvrcCfa0+Q15k7BdfZJ w724ZVwyB4DLchS/jgWT6OVyd3yTMeQIuV6yEvLJ8QhBwSYcq4pTHsB8od/mtO+zIJn6 DDgNCabwje0wduLk0YKgu9B5EbgDcBinx0Iv6Hv14VYcpznsMD94ffLEgOfXX7hqz7et Eis0oa6tn4UrhsxHXem2SHd6svybfA6lfxJtEGZdpT9vGxTDHEpTacGZajHdPh6OcSGp 3hRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Eeh4tdSVZEmAW4tHSPPY36m1AeY7Fvqavfw9DfeUWne8pBJzcp V16CPnuoKO1NWov+OkmZsgsSuN4sQAA9MA84FcoJZIiuxG4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+EN4fXDqbuDk3kf/Yg6ykwKuch/zIbtZqbYWrtlQXRoH+6CF1K0W/PY9svIz66ipePITi4m9F1jzt5MnNPPTI=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:73cc:: with SMTP id m12-v6mr2436851otk.302.1522252510753; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.196.140 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [188.206.102.123]
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803281636190.10477@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20180324110756.GE69302@vurt.meerval.net> <9a03dbfb-a4c7-9ca2-22c4-d00a0d0d0223@nlnetlabs.nl> <CADyWQ+G7oR5M9pHgj5Ty+4yL1nsep2mpujLiE7nf__kVmN13fQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180328151939.GA19504@jurassic> <20180328152433.GB1788@server.ds9a.nl> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1803281636190.10477@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:55:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CACWOCC8abR+t3F8Gc7bE6v-1PtznzHFrRcP5MO_zaVS8rHwjow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xu1tDWHSCJW6iUZDmzKVCoU3qWw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] raising the bar: requiring implementations
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 15:55:13 -0000

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well to allow the one remaining closed source DNS implementation some room,
>
> authoritative services: Akamai Amazon Cloudflare Dyn Google Verisign
> recursive services: Google OpenDNS Quad9
> COTS: Nominum

Those can just as well participate in implementation compatibility
matrices. While open source can make interop testing easier, it is
certainly not a requirement and shouldn't be treated as such.

Kind regards,

Job