IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping (dns-parameters)

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 08 May 2024 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB18C151531 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2024 13:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b="fc2M545N"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b="eJLwB9U3"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GIlTx5QE93Sb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 May 2024 13:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5162DC151548 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 May 2024 13:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7111 invoked from network); 8 May 2024 20:02:32 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1bbd663bda58.k2405; bh=aJov9jL5vWrUfQ4VXHHBPxDeHHq9R2bF8aY1bYoP3yI=; b=fc2M545NhLRW/cccEGbA82FXJ5/sVo3GwReLXSM3SQK8Itk39eT1UEWsPb/cvqq2wGprq8rZcnv9di/M7f1n4mmWB0yxZPSCUKf26lo4PNtOIbw/IrI4PbMUCz23815QyzF3AfEtw7PBt3VsFZTThiWvA5poWF+Pa2I2VO2JSKQgNyEFNaV8sGCTSx8GzbKcy0wE1tAaUSF850clybILwp4KwrCFp4PAHTrhJfZyN4oTnN0AZ3yAmQlY1BJ5VLz7Pn25UAVk6+7SbxPmzyFCr6ThqII+8QgVxO5XebOEUcie2wz+F53kv7kZ7gnGNfFAMV1Yzwc4SNNFYHF3s0WymA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1bbd663bda58.k2405; bh=aJov9jL5vWrUfQ4VXHHBPxDeHHq9R2bF8aY1bYoP3yI=; b=eJLwB9U33T6v2/2EadQyX2/xsmd465R2qIzW27yxzh10gfdqWi0afZmDR4XLD/6Q9alAFCPAl1kpKz4+E4VNTH97u29mX3uuNL/ZKDpvHot0ODUKf4poOe3MAUNlUFvxWfquF1v2FXUsO+Gzra0w0aA12bbD45eoWzGRXmSIdyimcny3gCKEYWwO8IRe1i2fqqkTqp3QJLkr0AvuSEGkqrmlKS5P/eGE5lNuKzOieD3vpBOB0Q3YuUWZ7qeV9bsRbYeobPSWWc4wqDTujPQYjDICF2BK+IYROhnWqDpa4uE5B2YADFx73yRS6/D4J0F1k4kARiMhrUy8sjzVbAzudA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 08 May 2024 20:02:32 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 777E18A4DCA6; Wed, 8 May 2024 16:02:31 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 16:02:31 -0400
Message-Id: <20240508200231.777E18A4DCA6@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <f9a72bf1-d09d-414d-a0ff-46cefd9907cd@nic.cz>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Message-ID-Hash: XOXZLWNNL2WSOMAEZB75MVUK3QD27D4B
X-Message-ID-Hash: XOXZLWNNL2WSOMAEZB75MVUK3QD27D4B
X-MailFrom: johnl@iecc.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: libor.peltan@nic.cz
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping (dns-parameters)
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/xvvXCXfQVchvmg8wgUv3I7pTrMk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

It appears that libor.peltan  <libor.peltan@nic.cz> said:
>Hi all,
>
>On the other hand, couldn't it actually be beneficial if the signalling 
>zone name is generic enough, and if (in theory on the future) it is 
>shared with possibly completely different signals, possibly unrelated to 
>DNSSEC?

It doesn't seem very likely to me that someone would come up with an
unrelated scheme that somehow used the same zone structure. And it's
not like there's any shortage of potential name strings.

_dnssec or maybe _dnssec-signal tell people what the name is used for.

R's,
John

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status