IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?

Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> Wed, 18 July 2018 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sara@sinodun.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2963130DD7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4cTpfOAMze4W for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C139A126F72 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [2001:67c:1232:144:b95e:e6e:30c8:a361] (port=56397) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <sara@sinodun.com>) id 1ffmmO-0001b5-9h for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:46:12 +0100
From: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:46:05 -0400
References: <20180717121406.GA6681@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <0E1026DD-2304-43FE-BEED-B9CE2981D9E3@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807171724540.3719@bofh.nohats.ca>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807171724540.3719@bofh.nohats.ca>
Message-Id: <06C09D4F-CD08-41F9-AC6A-C7054F23E686@sinodun.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 14
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/y0TPpGyCqTzzazOHbKuc6fgqyxY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:46:16 -0000


> On 17 Jul 2018, at 17:35, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, tjw ietf wrote:
> 
>> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] QNAME minimisation on the standards track?
>> I’d like to see a more fleshed out operational considerations section.
> 
> That would be good indeed. Especially with respect to broken DNS load
> balancers.
> 
> I have enabled it in Fedora from the start and did run into a few problem
> domains, and some people turning it off. But that happened less than I
> had expected. Red Hat did not yet enable this in RHEL7 but it is planned
> to be enabled in RHEL8.
> 
> But I do believe qname minimisation is an important privacy enhancing
> technology that we should strongly promote as a standards track
> document.

+1

Sara.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email