IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 08 May 2015 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC6C1ACE37 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2015 09:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W1PRswdQ3fyo for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2015 09:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f173.google.com (mail-pd0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716371ACE0F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2015 09:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdbqd1 with SMTP id qd1so90235897pdb.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 May 2015 09:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=Zmve6XKkoUs1nnipEfTJopRGWTXsiNo47hBIkm3t/AM=; b=YyY30a9KLPXVYSmsHmQ8cadlmv6puxMsw4AdwnusEPYwQBwghGpEThsxaPdH/FmfBz RLUJoizQbU0KfbweHXyaeTdmhTMtWRpjaSYlQPNPCwY2RjB2W/y/1lXcefAVDdZbUCtQ 6If9Wpfl+MqEz3p7rbiFvoUrSqOhc+Am7Fg+7ca0hrHlTMnbdVYIekNLgDJF5YILneZM FQn6EahC1pJLhhYUEceG+a+x8BEB+FRajoTVmVN8QBBbZkAlbS4rdRj1ylZQ8FHdAtQj pEVoiJgogp1mDu+Wu3u8zz3GMcGovF6lnEpYVj10cVxilQnLbk6bpELeS7u/iigOkyCl 1Yzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlu/+RaRgzFJHHvoM9PNxXCkf147UZKP0nRR+u/3tuHQSwb65r5uTqQutl9gdNqy4LPyTZU
X-Received: by 10.70.133.66 with SMTP id pa2mr7996374pdb.164.1431103722312; Fri, 08 May 2015 09:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (c-50-184-24-209.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [50.184.24.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kh6sm5695137pbc.50.2015.05.08.09.48.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 May 2015 09:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_445C6A80-9C44-40B5-B11C-7C46881AD5B9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150508013042.3B9252DEAD71@rock.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 09:48:40 -0700
Message-Id: <EF4521EF-8D06-403E-8869-8F2D4DDE76B8@virtualized.org>
References: <D5D3A5AC-41B5-4872-B973-2752275D651E@gmail.com> <D170E3E4.1011F2%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> <20150508013042.3B9252DEAD71@rock.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/y49cHI4Zm25mqgJWdb90RLt6feQ>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 16:49:12 -0000

Mark,

> "home", "corp" and perhaps "mail" need special handling if we really
> want to not cause problems for those using those tlds internally.

Why?

What objective criteria makes those TLDs special?

(note that I am not disagreeing, just asking for the methodology by which we can declare some TLDs as not delegatable)

Regards,
-drc
(ICANN CTO, but speaking only for myself. Really.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email