Re: [DNSOP] Updated NSEC5 protocol spec and paper

Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> Thu, 09 March 2017 21:05 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@dnss.ec>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E184129518 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:05:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dnss.ec
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yD9bgokQGEst for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:05:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E400D1294E7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 1so139454519qkl.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:05:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dnss.ec; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=prLUWW1OlEcMvB+i0JlNGlmC5mxHjLuP1FFFLsy+hUk=; b=Aehi4pXMmDGVtPOHoHQphmSch4eLYqAilReYWysnLVofQCtIm07jrYpPAu7ytuuCkr gG54F3krsX4Dz4qL7ppS42/42Y8u9uE+OTm7yiLD8yFUoW8SR9RJay93H2Oq37OnsrTK JXRsg1abLUZIQZzyEpgGj8okzbVcZMnSWl7Co=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=prLUWW1OlEcMvB+i0JlNGlmC5mxHjLuP1FFFLsy+hUk=; b=hVIiYhRSgvDecpQsEe5yWfV/qcfOVwxumMMLiY5bW8x9arCUQwg/d0Z/iFK1UqSl99 FTfIXT1CplZ3Y8d2CiAaRMaNyP7hTB/sAeDts0WaIJAeFhZKf4LJnznXqRqSDSvHQ/HE NLLFO9bhAXNqgr2oDiT+N0DLsg3bUHVbfc25X0yLf8LibqMAFS+uT6g99JuQQ9scS+rP 7tFPT7JF9Gb1o4sMueSEN54Kzo8+ZJElvgsT+WYknaWTuoS+Tm3fAMSLIG6HowafduPF NwTDD937KDK9MDU7Bhe15KuEXhryW0uxGHLu9MTxtb1vUfHzDzGDrenlnAUfxHKF8wnp HQ7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39ljWVCc4mOJskTPKr0eBXNExSk74FkfgHNduNjmsUMilLDfWEMts+2tj37dI8g0xQ==
X-Received: by 10.237.34.140 with SMTP id p12mr17506921qtc.111.1489093551574; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:05:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.82] (host86-132-188-185.range86-132.btcentralplus.com. [86.132.188.185]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q67sm5017280qkl.48.2017.03.09.13.05.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgoQEN42DCbWDDy0vNTcJ1tBovX18txDErzcxFTOoAzSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 21:05:48 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <64D446DB-2638-4894-B3C6-1FA2B8E4BB1E@dnss.ec>
References: <CAHPuVdXTcSaVcN6fBbPy3e=PgRvg8=GemSN_YFhzX387x8YW-A@mail.gmail.com> <CFBF172D-FDD7-4DE1-B5C5-7C76A7792549@vpnc.org> <CAMm+LwgoQEN42DCbWDDy0vNTcJ1tBovX18txDErzcxFTOoAzSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yCk5GgkxAVdxCGB0HG0Ok__dtLo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Updated NSEC5 protocol spec and paper
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 21:05:54 -0000

> On 9 Mar 2017, at 20:58, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
> 
> I suggest we first deploy NSEC0 which simply nulls out the whole NSEC/NXT issue entirely.

What is NSEC0?

Roy