Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-15.txt

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Mon, 05 November 2018 03:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07635128BCC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:08:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SLIPxT3UD69I for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:08:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54250127333 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:08:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-9701.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.151.1]:54784) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1gJVFX-0005ri-D9 (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Mon, 05 Nov 2018 03:08:23 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <154127656499.10164.10170177869879078794@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAedzxqGsyi1pyyMqmVWiZOgJivr3R1dTWL_9Vwh=0EPCj5DuQ@mail.gmail.com> <e5464033-ae01-4ab8-5c5d-ceb3194d6a71@dcrocker.net>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <bfb33bf3-c2c8-8edd-01f8-e18687a6496d@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:08:24 +0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e5464033-ae01-4ab8-5c5d-ceb3194d6a71@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yGEVjOpZiwzohm-C5t0jevmrTk0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-15.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 03:08:31 -0000


On 05/11/2018 09:56, Dave Crocker wrote:

> Clever suggestion.  Seems like obvious benefit with no obvious detriment.
> 
> So I immediately went to add it and then realized that doing this 
> cleanly will take an entry for each RR...

Why not this?

+------------+------------------+------------+
| RR Type    | _NODE NAME       | REFERENCE  |
+------------+------------------+------------+
| *          | _example         | [TBD]      |

Ray