Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-03.txt

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Wed, 13 September 2017 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FF5132320 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPWF28IJChln for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88C6A133041 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id q80so654789ywg.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9H1NBy9R2MlkfEv7K304j1S9zZOzsh5H4vdZ4NyrulQ=; b=qPl1oh/lbBQdXQBVyqXk2+zuKTQWn7hx6WzWew3DX/Zq7lap0t7NDSp5YSZnohYeN6 8VIQzyXsecP2QnqJjD/Wa0+HID7NoCOGxo+wpvJDR+U+/kGch1HdRY4rwM7o6HZrIVcX 1AEzmpiiT1mGxefU0fFLDxrcyQY30rCRXKDCBkiIvh7oHcfdt98SLy8aHoIcVWMkwgQc uz8ytZVuncZiYHM7mvqC9COvBmMz86S036wJ4abU6Lmk2at5k+M8ymjmwBiAM1zFzWb1 y7NE4akrsHpvjFAyvDJ1fd9j3ORZnfQBTrjiiKGDdRmE/IB1cW48cm8Uml3ZGhXHFdLI 4C0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9H1NBy9R2MlkfEv7K304j1S9zZOzsh5H4vdZ4NyrulQ=; b=t4roiD+GP6TYw9Qt2zuOK+rzczmBm7WKZ0w65ZAta3H2Ygdakyt5cN+n5K0LcA+B4D PExlsruvMSbu+a5QaAgrYiqWL0WB8RonFSb4wjrxbJxIo8aGeLKJHNgy5Pwlklr70WDi T3mdAq4+Z/MVywuEolPwogYMlpYzmHY9O1VWpycSKGYxXZ1Z6SIh/DoDSsR3GeI1S/iw 3EM8OMIz/07bnNr1JecEpa9RbKB/z4rvlDxrAW3WYl3U2JxsH1NP5cC+Djk+c7W4jAr/ Wg8IdHhm2n3hN/gQR11o6KoFnTRjh7VCmwotdfKZbIsY4863jkHyc8MSgML8rHu1m6Gl bxJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjSwWWXo0EiI6RT06jnDvA3fWG0RzLXNpEMsEfTogczG3HnMKZS 6kyTwap9BiEz6aiCParF+DJvge8C3xDUf24bey+5iQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7TqGcutwf7fuXwFBTYgfPInvvDrO5po7H84OfAbHsZT44/ksfSpsioaG+dq2dXhM5/uI8iv3maqCBDB4ANF20=
X-Received: by 10.37.6.69 with SMTP id 66mr6645508ybg.19.1505310552533; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.118.16 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150525870106.30485.18179687243292311597@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <150525870106.30485.18179687243292311597@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:49:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8DT4jYE6=jgvN5GcRm+X4JBTGnSmv75DDLcrgXveG9h1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
Cc: i-d-announce@ietf.org, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113b35ccc2d3200559126c46"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yGHU5XTQhZkpSnCzKEP1j5VRc8g>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 13:49:26 -0000

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 7:25 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the
> IETF.
>
>         Title           : Security Considerations for RFC5011 Publishers
>         Authors         : Wes Hardaker
>                           Warren Kumari
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-
> security-considerations-03.txt
>         Pages           : 13
>         Date            : 2017-09-12
>
> Abstract:
>    This document extends the RFC5011 rollover strategy with timing
>    advice that must be followed in order to maintain security.
>    Specifically, this document describes the math behind the minimum
>    time-length that a DNS zone publisher must wait before signing
>    exclusively with recently added DNSKEYs.  This document also
>    describes the minimum time-length that a DNS zone publisher must wait
>    after publishing a revoked DNSKEY before assuming that all active
>    RFC5011 resolvers should have seen the revocation-marked key and
>    removed it from their list of trust anchors.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-
> security-considerations/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-
> security-considerations-03
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-
> considerations-03
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-
> security-considerations-03
>
>
>
5.1.1.  Attack Timing Breakdown

"T+11 through T-29"

"T-29" should be "T+29"

-- 
Bob Harold