IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Tue, 30 January 2018 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D47412E878 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:44:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9QjdWPG1UI6Q for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:44:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1D312EAF4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:44:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id o35so19570990qtj.13 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:44:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9AOJZhcz3r9/YCLyg6/gvBHh1NtyGdpDSE0kv3x3z5Q=; b=s7tD9sgO2lKxykxANd1/UqLI/P3MTfh1kIdcDar0gUMNTt6f2qkYOkShK5YAYQmvsz zGQhB/spHzpWWpqeTItQ7OrMS425jNuUaYK/BLRZG1AKNJbVpunNM7dpwCZfAf2vS502 TyNrtU4Bkwb0B2lMeOIOtZv0cRFP79dzqtLSYcSldCqSkBQVvR/55Xu1aKMbmL97KIbj 4dQGcD1mQ1XLcssIdDLC1CNLxzRK/IztePnqfMS309pxKGgsY2kTIn6+Lx3BcXuAcLW5 jlGLNwzb7prD60nhXA5+6JPz4sitls21AUjYE2KMwxrEtEDkQmdlOwsSr3v0peEQUWGd sP8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9AOJZhcz3r9/YCLyg6/gvBHh1NtyGdpDSE0kv3x3z5Q=; b=RSlCwYnIB/prN+u7oyJi79K9vakzS1l4abxQcvEo0KuBDFbCAZGYCOzI+B1viuv0hB U9mJUDRvKFCmcsOvZl/a1P6XbkJvU6AovMtpscpHOCqrAP/3VW9J9mHaRQ5ZoJvkSfsF Ch8ffc8Z2NJNXZypbQF1PXokFJT96HyGVInJ7f22baIllV0OjcQD2IIvjI2qfaq4t+Y9 Jd1iPOMi7CCDALtPWDcmbOqFw+8JO6bwh/CWBF7Zc3eBJLdn92PLHlw05PNDh2BSaO+s U6nVDASDtv2Z4yBO/s5xzoEoFuk+e5HhmgxVPk4eWJQCVJ4kEijeUa5awmKmHY5lgYRb e6vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfxxEuS2SG+MD6e6cdZ/+8yZ37HmJaePDwqh8ciRrhHMUld1uYK Fd6v2I+kA9MCJJzGGkqepA4YOJ+Gxmv4HFlOVXrYxjHw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225TCvmpSqyoW0NDTmYPgYaZGDler8qplcmgYRbO7LECSw6GSLe0fWEly2N0NYKRQMbQtEy3t6GgtsGLQXPDGdM=
X-Received: by 10.237.46.70 with SMTP id j64mr251441qtd.178.1517355850957; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:44:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.47.4 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:44:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dc0:2001:210:b1bd:7ad4:f7b9:9677]
In-Reply-To: <20180130185128.GI19193@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <151062636258.5917.14497839377888768972@ietfa.amsl.com> <20180128080134.24987d69@titan.int.futz.org> <CAHw9_iLDid5-3JJ5gffdsR_PMCAEwwxB3i7ORLiBVtKwmt0khQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180129233755.3697ee79@grisu.home.partim.org> <20180130152459.GE18485@mx4.yitter.info> <9787FD03-4E91-46DC-92E0-85513D6A9B40@hopcount.ca> <20180130185128.GI19193@mx4.yitter.info>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 09:44:10 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn0LSjtJL_zci1i=aUYq6bd7vDos_QfiEiS=W0kygXS_MQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yGM3Rl6YNz_rd5dfkGOjVNn88Xk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 23:44:14 -0000

I think we're rat holing. I'm not an author on this draft, but I know
them both, and I work with one, and I believe the draft is basically
in the right space and .. well.. we're rat holing.

So, noting my disclaimer of bias, can we .. move on? Is there real
matters of substance left on this one? It feels like its close.

-G

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:51 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:42:15AM -0500, Joe Abley wrote:
>>
>> I realise that the following is not what anybody means in this thread
>
> Hmm.  Actually, I wasn't sure :-)
>
>> I probably missed some. Anyway, I think when people are saying "address record" here they actually mean "IP address record".
>>
>
> We should probably say that, then, and also of course we should fix
> the poor text in the teminology document to point this out.
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status