Re: [DNSOP] Status of "let localhost be localhost"?

Ted Lemon <> Sat, 12 August 2017 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BAD13219F for <>; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 10:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XwIKvJZ8xY8Y for <>; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 10:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB3A813213D for <>; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 10:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id s6so35385524qtc.1 for <>; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 10:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=NKLW87FxGkrLZ1M4iuNEOmqYXFBr+Qiy1VBnHb+XNRI=; b=d0zWFxDKR5zxMiwTHtfsUO28N26KrYYx8VzJzxN2IYLLbJP84u0c+i17dgJX0S5Dhu aRG7UdeYY6lUdwZkWQTNodXSScUk9HOusb2+LqE4Rud0NibenZgXkNGZ3zC6SAPKyZXH iVefmRwwAfxDJCBUi5cVzbB4haehCoNlM1H+9Hs/XObtJrqU2MIdY5U5BhGWdudrx9Fh wsRi9DVJB9FmFePKiziFFqRzv6CPXJbFvG09L4FGbpAvnuEfO6JWq5mjQXPquzNRjgwx qQ2BcYjKEgknl95agPteI0MKEL/lCcqMDg1fTru11ZOwY/l5oOo/oFbPPKtfLH9CPgng FZXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=NKLW87FxGkrLZ1M4iuNEOmqYXFBr+Qiy1VBnHb+XNRI=; b=XaFTGDZVUwJkN9GvNmuhrZlU+r1YsxcUcjihd87gF+gqDxzZrtoZvLxcZZPPxCeZDm 9jo3h7FSlQVkUunmU64hCkluKi4KXmbql6f6xE+SXRzESjVQPA8bpFH/woJ3ZKVR8PTi nqbL1qqtDiSyy2Z1pEHrmQvptkup2GAagIfefDeW1fT0cikJjktCJqorddHuUN6nlkq2 aVxgN6LNBo/boEn7KcR4aufCnx9eQVR0JtgjESBcIncG2H9YjtN42dXnoaWr+O2+xP/F C7g7Yr0MF0boHsrgiC8zqsOZ8Vg/fpa6elusOMSK8tuWrU9lLjBU7CGrQVloyXoCEuIX M8gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5heOpwSRMWHwMxaIFbGDx0QfDCCa9h8H02s7i8JM8L9yWnFXY7D vEmNtXf62k5EiA9bdDdK1g==
X-Received: by with SMTP id d29mr26724002qte.79.1502558077379; Sat, 12 Aug 2017 10:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cavall.ether.lede.home ( []) by with ESMTPSA id x17sm2489678qta.47.2017. for <> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Aug 2017 10:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 13:14:35 -0400
References: <20170812170958.14197.qmail@ary.lan>
To: dnsop <>
In-Reply-To: <20170812170958.14197.qmail@ary.lan>
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Status of "let localhost be localhost"?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2017 17:14:41 -0000

El 12 ag 2017, a les 13:09, John Levine <> va escriure:
> Right.  That's why it's long past time that we make it clear that
> non-broken resolvers at any level will treat localhost as a special
> case.  As you may have heard, we are not the Network Police, but we do
> publish the occasional document telling people what to do if they want
> to interoperate with the rest of the Internet.

With respect, John, the issue I raised here isn't interop.  It's security.   It may be that I'm wrong, but if indeed I am wrong about this particular point, it is not for this particular reason.