Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-wkumari-dnsop-alt-tld-00.txt

ok, maybe this suggestion below is weird, but... 
- since they are not looking at a real delegated TLD.
- why not just register a URN namespace and use it as they see fit?

Marc.

Le 2014-02-13 à 09:59, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> a écrit :

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 01:24:07PM -0500, Joe Abley wrote:
>> 
>> I think therefore that the ALT draft addresses quite a different problem: the choice of DNS-like (but not DNS) name structure for new applications that we don't know about yet.
>> 
> 
> I won't speak for Warren, but certainly this is _my_ view of our goal.
> I do not want our current proposal (which doubtless needs improvements
> in details) to get bound up with whether existing uses ought instead
> to be subsumed.  But on another list we just heard about yet _another_
> of these "pseudo-TLDs" crawling out of the woodwork.  When it was
> observed to said pseudo-TLD pusher that the approach might run into
> fewer problems if it were anchored somewhere else, he said that it was
> a feature that it attacked the IANA root.  If we don't have an
> ordinary and standard place where such uses can fit, then these sorts
> of vandals will have a pragmatic argument open to them.  If we _do_
> have a standard place for this stuff, then at least the pragmatic
> argument will be closed, and we can have a discussion about the merits,
> understanding that the goal really is in many cases to attack the
> orderly operation of the public DNS.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop